Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God
Gunner Asch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.society.liberalism,alt.atheism,alt.fun,alt.politics.democrats.d,talk.politics.guns |
|---|---|
| Organization | Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/24/2026 6:35 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies: > In article <guOiS.22323$W%[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >> >> On 8/23/2026 4:29 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted >> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch >> of lies: >>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>> >>>> On 8/23/2026 8:13 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted >>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch >>>> of lies: >>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2026-08-22 18:11, Andrew wrote: >>>>>>> "OrigInfoJunkie" wrote in message news:[email protected]... >>>>>>>> On 8/22/2026 11:05 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, >>>>>>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted >>>>>>>> another content-free batch of lies: >>>>>>>>> In article [email protected] says... >>>>>>>>>> Andrew wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> "Alan" wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Attila" wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, if there is no plausible Darwinian pathway for our >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> origins, then pure logic points us to Creation by a most >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> awesome and wonderful Creator. . . >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The process is not yet known, that's all. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For those who accept what science has already discovered, there >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is no debate. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They know that...., >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is an established scientific law. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Look it up, its called, "The Law of Biogenesis" >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life." >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 'A Common Misconception >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Have any exceptions ever been note? [sic] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yes ? *noted*, not "note." >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Some creationists have argued that the law >>>>>>>>>>>> of biogenesis undermines evolutionary theory >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yes, it undermines the "goo to you" deceptioen that >>>>>>>>>>> has deceived the gullible masses, who simply accept >>>>>>>>>>> whatever they are told. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That's you. You're the fool who has obediently accepted every nugget >>>>>>>>>> of stupid >>>>>>>>>> religious bullshit you've been force-fed your entire life. And you >>>>>>>>>> always drank >>>>>>>>>> all your milk and ate your vegetables, every day. Good boy! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yet you nor anyone else can prove otherwise. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No one can "prove" anything in this. Instead, we develop theories that >>>>>>>> best explain the observations and evidence. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You fantasize scenarios all of which happen to be contrary to >>>>>>> established science, yet you fail to see that you have been >>>>>>> deceived. >>>>>> >>>>>> Given an example of this: the scenario and the "established science". >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Creation science" isn't such a theory. It's garbage. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> All evidence tells us that our origins has been the result of >>>>>>> ----- >>>> an intelligent causation <<<<. >>>>>> >>>>>> What "evidence"? >>>>>> >>>>>> Start with a single example. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Evolution is the best such theory. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For our origins? No way. >>>>>> By a long way. >>>>>> >>>>>> It is as proven as anything non-trivial can be. >>>>> >>>>> It's still a theory. >>>> >>>> That's an idiotic thing to say. If a theory explains a phenomenon well, it's a >>>> good theory, and we believe it. >>> >>> And still a theory. >> >> *The* accepted theory by smart people. Not "just" a theory ? the theory that >> best explains what we observe. > > So "maybe or maybe not". Not at all. >> You hate science. You don't know science, and that's why you hate it. > > I don't hate anything You hate science.