Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God

On 8/23/2026 3:45 PM, Alan wrote:
> On 2026-08-23 15:19, Skeeter wrote:
>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
>>>
>>> On 2026-08-22 15:51, Skeeter wrote:
>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2026-08-22 14:02, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2026-08-22 11:05, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 8/22/2026 4:26 AM, Andrew wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> "Alan" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Attila" wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, if there is no plausible Darwinian pathway for our
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> origins, then pure logic points us to Creation by a most
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> awesome and wonderful Creator. . .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The process is not yet known, that's all.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For those who accept what science has already discovered, there is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no debate.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They know that....,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is an established scientific law.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Look it up, its called, "The Law of Biogenesis"
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life."
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 'A Common Misconception
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Have any exceptions ever been note? [sic]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes ? *noted*, not "note."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Some creationists have argued that the law
>>>>>>>>>>> of biogenesis undermines evolutionary theory
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes, it undermines the "goo to you" deceptioen that
>>>>>>>>>> has deceived the gullible masses, who simply accept
>>>>>>>>>> whatever they are told.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That's you. You're the fool who has obediently accepted every nugget of 
>>>>>>>>> stupid
>>>>>>>>> religious bullshit you've been force-fed your entire life. And you 
>>>>>>>>> always drank
>>>>>>>>> all your milk and ate your vegetables, every day. Good boy!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yet you nor anyone else can prove otherwise.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And you can't prove your religious bullshit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not being religious. You are trying to make it look that way spin boy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The point is you can prove me wrong even if I was a firm believer.
>>>>> I don't have to prove you wrong, Cupcake.
>>>>
>>>> If I had the answers then so would you. You idiot.
>>>>>
>>>>> But you explicitly said the universe was created by a god.
>>>>
>>>> No I didn't. I said "if" there was a God. That would answer a lot of questions
>>>> and no theories.
>>>>>
>>>>> That requires belief that such a god exists.
>>>>
>>>> You have taken the whole conversation and twisted it to suit you. As usual. If
>>>> there is a God thing would make more sense. "IF" there was. I never said I knew
>>>> for sure there was. If fact I don't know and neither do you. You don't know how
>>>> to have a discussion without turning it into an argument.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> It would only "make more sense" if you ignore the obvious question:
>>>
>>> If a god explains the existence of the universe, then what explains the
>>> existence of a god?
>>
>> That would be for him/her to decide.
>>
>>
>>
> 
> Look, your entire argument boils down to:
> 
> "I (personally) cannot understand how the universe came to be, and so there must 
> be a god involved, and it's OK if I don't understand how he came to be...because 
> he's a god and that's different."

Skeeter-Shit just said above that "god" somehow created herself. That's what he 
said, without realizing he was saying it.

> 
> It certainly spares you any need to think.