Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God
Mark Wieber <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.society.liberalism,alt.atheism,alt.fun,alt.politics.democrats.d,talk.politics.guns |
|---|---|
| Organization | Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/24/2026 7:08 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies: > In article <[email protected]>, chronic.loser@dole- > scroungers.of.taft says... >> >> On 8/24/2026 6:37 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted >> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch >> of lies: >>> In article <HvOiS.22324$W%[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>> >>>> On 8/23/2026 8:29 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted >>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch >>>> of lies: >>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>> >>>>>> On 8/22/2026 4:51 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted >>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch >>>>>> of lies: >>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 8/22/2026 3:16 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted >>>>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch >>>>>>>> of lies: >>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-08-22 14:01, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-08-22 07:53, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-08-21 15:56, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-08-21 15:27, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-08-21 13:40, Andrew wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Attila" wrote: > "Andrew" wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, if there is no plausible Darwinian pathway for our >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> origins, then pure logic points us to Creation by a most >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> awesome and wonderful Creator. . . >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The process is not yet known, that's all. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For those who accept what science has already discovered, there is no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> debate. They know that...., >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is > an established scientific law. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Look it up, its called, "The Law of Biogenesis" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'A Common Misconception >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some creationists have argued that the law of biogenesis undermines >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evolutionary theory and the theory that all life originated from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inorganic material billions of years ago. However, biogenesis simply >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> invalidates the theory of spontaneous generation?it speaks to what can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be accomplished in generational time spans, not over the course of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thousands of generations or millions of years.' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.sciencing.com/theory-biogenesis-5419233/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Accoring to whom? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All those who accept empirical science. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So that leaves you out. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You will have a lot of explaining to do when life is found on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exoplanets.... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> God already told us about that.. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "For thus saith the Lord that created the heavens, God Himself that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> formed the earth and made it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He hath established it, He created it not in vain, He formed it to be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inhabited:" ~ Isaiah 45:18 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And where did your god come from? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan tries again. Tell us where we came from. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You tell us where we came from and everyone you put "god", I'll put >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> universe. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I never claimed to know where we came from. The universe also came from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure you did. You said "god did it". >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I said in context to "if there was a god". You know that and are trying to spin >>>>>>>>>>>>> it again. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You claimed that that there is a god and he created the universe, Cupcake. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I didn't claim that. I said IF there were a God. Alan trying to shuffle out >>>>>>>>>>> again. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Nope. You explicitly said that god did it and justified with with the >>>>>>>>>> inane idea that somehow matter requires a creator but a "god" doesn't. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You are way off base spin boy. If there is a God then he did it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That doesn't follow. How do you know she didn't just sit around and watch it happen? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I guess you will never know. >>>>>> >>>>>> *You* are the one who does not know and will never know. >>>>> >>>>> That means you do. >>>> >>>> No. >>>> >>> So you admit >> >> Whenever you say "So you admit," you're lying. There is no "admission." >> >>>>>>>> If there is a god ? and there's no reason to think there is or ever was ? it's >>>>>>>> perfectly plausible she is a completely passive god who never lifted a finger to >>>>>>>> "create" anything. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Maybe so, but >>>>>> >>>>>> Gotcha! >>>>> >>>>> Nope. >>>> >>>> Yep. I've got you. You can't show that any "god" created anything, even though >>>> you claim she did. >>> >>> I never claimed that. >> >> You did. Everyone saw it. >> >> You're a knuckle-dragging Krys-stain true believer. You think Genesis is a >> science and history book. It isn't. It's fairy tales. > > Prove it wrong. You have to prove it right. No one ever has the burden to prove anything wrong. Prove it right. But of course, you can't.