Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God
Mark Wieber <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.society.liberalism,alt.atheism,alt.fun,alt.politics.democrats.d,talk.politics.guns |
|---|---|
| Organization | Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/24/2026 8:36 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies: > In article <[email protected]>, chronic.loser@dole- > scroungers.of.taft says... >> >> On 8/24/2026 7:45 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted >> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch >> of lies: >>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>> >>>> On 8/23/2026 3:45 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>> On 2026-08-23 15:19, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2026-08-22 15:51, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2026-08-22 14:02, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-08-22 11:05, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/22/2026 4:26 AM, Andrew wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Alan" wrote in message news:[email protected]... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Attila" wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, if there is no plausible Darwinian pathway for our >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> origins, then pure logic points us to Creation by a most >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> awesome and wonderful Creator. . . >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The process is not yet known, that's all. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For those who accept what science has already discovered, there is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no debate. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They know that...., >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is an established scientific law. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Look it up, its called, "The Law of Biogenesis" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'A Common Misconception >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have any exceptions ever been note? [sic] >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes ? *noted*, not "note." >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some creationists have argued that the law >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of biogenesis undermines evolutionary theory >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, it undermines the "goo to you" deceptioen that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> has deceived the gullible masses, who simply accept >>>>>>>>>>>>>> whatever they are told. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That's you. You're the fool who has obediently accepted every nugget of >>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid >>>>>>>>>>>>> religious bullshit you've been force-fed your entire life. And you >>>>>>>>>>>>> always drank >>>>>>>>>>>>> all your milk and ate your vegetables, every day. Good boy! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yet you nor anyone else can prove otherwise. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And you can't prove your religious bullshit. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm not being religious. You are trying to make it look that way spin boy. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The point is you can prove me wrong even if I was a firm believer. >>>>>>>>> I don't have to prove you wrong, Cupcake. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If I had the answers then so would you. You idiot. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But you explicitly said the universe was created by a god. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No I didn't. I said "if" there was a God. That would answer a lot of questions >>>>>>>> and no theories. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That requires belief that such a god exists. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You have taken the whole conversation and twisted it to suit you. As usual. If >>>>>>>> there is a God thing would make more sense. "IF" there was. I never said I knew >>>>>>>> for sure there was. If fact I don't know and neither do you. You don't know how >>>>>>>> to have a discussion without turning it into an argument. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It would only "make more sense" if you ignore the obvious question: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If a god explains the existence of the universe, then what explains the >>>>>>> existence of a god? >>>>>> >>>>>> That would be for him/her to decide. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Look, your entire argument boils down to: >>>>> >>>>> "I (personally) cannot understand how the universe came to be, and so there must >>>>> be a god involved, and it's OK if I don't understand how he came to be...because >>>>> he's a god and that's different." >>>> >>>> Skeeter-Shit just said above that "god" somehow created herself. That's what he >>>> said, without realizing he was saying it. >>>> >>> >>> I never said it. >> >> Absolutely you said it. You're just too fucking stupid and illogical to realize >> you said it, Sunday school boy. > > I never said that. Absolutely you said it, Sunday school boy. You absolutely said that god created herself.