Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God
Rudy Canoza <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.society.liberalism,alt.atheism,alt.fun,alt.politics.democrats.d,talk.politics.guns |
|---|---|
| Organization | Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/24/2026 12:26 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies: > In article <1F%[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >> >> On 8/24/2026 10:51 AM, Samuel Spade wrote: >>> "Andrew" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> "Ubiquitous" wrote >>>>> Andrew wrote: >>>>>> "Alan" wrote: >>>>>>> Andrew wrote: >>>>>>>> "Ubiquitous" wrote: >>>>>>>>> Not the issue. That knuckle-dragging credulous gullible fuckwit "Andrew" said that science says "Life comes only from >>>>>>>>> previously existing life," and that's false. Science doesn't say that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yet the fact remains, with - no exceptions noted. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Life comes_only_from previously existing life," >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The fact remains that experiments have already shown that the molecules of life can create themselves from simple chemicals as >>>>>>> science believes were to be found in the earliest days of the Earth's formation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The fact remains that such molecules can self-assemble into more complex molecules. >>>>>> ____________________________________________________ >>>>>> >>>>>> Still the fact remains, >>>>> >>>>> What you're calling a fact is not a fact ? it is bullshit. >>>> >>>> Then can you cite any exceptions to this.- anywhere, anytime? >>>> >>>> "Life comes_only_from previously existing life," <---- >>> >>> >>> Sure. >>> >>> We know there was one or more abiogenetic events that spawned >>> life on earth. Life exists, therefore it must have come from >>> abiotic non-life, just like you always wanted. >>> >>> Unless, of course, you think life is eternal. >>> >>> Got any more "Laws Of Science" to discuss? >> >> "Andrew" still sees things through his age 7 Sunday school eyes. He believes >> what he does about the origin of the universe because "the bible tells me >> [Andrew] so." >> >> As I have said a few times before, "Andrew" would believe an animist creation >> myth if he had been born in Africa, or a Taoist or Confucian or Buddhist myth if >> born in China, or a Hindu myth if born in India. He would believe the Native >> American "Giant Turtle" myth if he had been born into any of several tribes. >> "Andrew's" is not a reasoned position ? it's just religious dogma dressed up in >> "sciency" language. It's myth. He believes it because he finds it comforting. >> That's all it is. > > Yet you can't prove anything else. I've proved that you and Sunday school bitch "Andrew" only believe what you do because of where you were born.