Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God

Michael A Terrell <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]: 

> On 8/22/2026 4:56 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted
> another content-free batch of lies:
>> In article <[email protected]>,
>> [email protected] says...
>>>
>>> On 8/22/2026 3:43 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
>>> Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking
>>> do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies:
>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2026-08-22 04:26, Andrew wrote:
>>>>>> "Alan" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>> Andrew wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> "Attila" wrote
>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> <<>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, if there is no plausible Darwinian pathway for our
>>>>>>>>>>>> origins, then pure logic points us to Creation by a most
>>>>>>>>>>>> awesome and wonderful Creator. . .
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The process is not yet known, that's all.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> For those who accept what science has already discovered,
>>>>>>>>>> there is no debate.
>>>>>>>>>> They know that....,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That is an established scientific law.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Look it up, its called, "The Law of Biogenesis"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 'A Common Misconception
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Have any exceptions ever been note?
>>>>>> None, except in the fantasy world of
>>>>>> the fool.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Some creationists have argued that the law
>>>>>>> of biogenesis undermines evolutionary theory
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, it undermines the "goo to you" deceptioen that
>>>>>> has deceived the gullible masses, who simply accept
>>>>>> whatever they are told.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and the theory that all life originated from
>>>>>>> inorganic material billions of years ago.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What a bunch of unscientific nonsense!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However, biogenesis simply invalidates
>>>>>>> the theory of spontaneous generation?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OK, so it's invalidated. And exposes
>>>>>> the fact that you have been deceived.
>>>>> All it invalidated was the idea that COMPLEX organisms arise
>>>>> sponteneously. 
>>>>
>>>> They can't. What's your point?
>>>
>>> They can evolve from less complex ones.
>> 
>> Where did these "less complex" ones come from?
> 
> Another bad-faith failed "gotcha" question.
> 
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In specific, it disproved the notion that flies simply arise from
>>>>> rotting meat.
>>>>
>>>> Nope.
>>>
>>> Yep.
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> But you didn't bother even looking into it, did you?
>>>
>>> <crickets>
>> 
>> Not my argument.
> 
> You didn't look into it.
> 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> it speaks to what can be accomplished in generational time
>>>>>>> spans, not over the
>>>>>>> course of thousands of generations or millions of years.'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which is the fantasy they taught you, not science.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope. Lots of experiments have been run showing that the basic
>>>>> chemicals of life (amino acids in particular) can arise from
>>>>> simple compounds like ammonia and methane (et al):
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Where did the ammonia and methane come from?
>>>
>>> Naturally occurring.
>> 
>> What is Natural. They are both compounds that can be broken down. So
>> they are made of other things. Where did those other things come
>> from? 
> 
> Naturally occurring.
> 
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller%E2%80%93Urey_experiment>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But you accepted what they said.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because you were *gullible*
>>>>>
>>>>> And you believe a book...
>>>>>
>>>>> ...because the book tells you to believe it.
>> 
>> And you believe the left 
> 
> You believe bullshit that's been force-fed to you by some religious
> crackpot charlatan.

What's the difference between them and politicians?