Re: 78 Trans Am with 350 engine? - NOT stock
Roscoe M <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Feb 2023 15:47:55 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | alt.autos.camaro.firebird |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
" I'd put my '78 T/A against same era 'vette in the slalom any day." AND Y= OU WOULD LOOSE. I've had both cars. On Wednesday, December 17, 1997 at 12:00:00=E2=80=AFAM UTC-8, Tim Osler wro= te: > BikeDude1 wrote: > >=20 > > TA 6.6 had 40 more hp, can tell by the decal on the scoop. TA 6.6 =3D 2= 20 hp. > > I know I know, big f deal, 100 less than 98 WS-6. But all the hp was co= rked > > up w/ restrictive exhaust and intake. Let the 78 bird breathe right (he= aders > > & intake mods) and u got some righteous muscle.... > Actually, hp was only 188@4000 in '78: where the T/A excelled at was > torque: 340@1700 That's a lot of shove just barely off-idle.;-) 'Course > it needs it to launch a 4000lb (actually 3950) off the line with any > authority at all. It wasn't until '79 that the T/A went to 220 hp.=20 > Torque went down to 320@2800. This made it more of a highway car where > its more than capable handling skills came into play. I'd put my '78 > T/A against same era 'vette in the slalom any day.