Re: [NEWS] Subaru spinning off sub-brand for Outback and Forester
Frank <"frank "@frank.net> Fri, 19 Feb 2021 09:40:21 -0500
| Newsgroups | alt.autos.subaru |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2/18/2021 2:06 PM, Your Name wrote: > > From Jalopnik.com ... > > > Subaru Is Spinning Off A Sub-Brand For The Outback And Forester > --------------------------------------------------------------- > Subaru wants in on the sweet, sweet profit margins that upgraded > models of current production cars bring, so it's going ahead > with the strategy by forming a new sub-brand for the Outback and > Forester. > > The Japanese carmaker is no longer oblivious to the upsell. It > will launch a sub-brand called Wilderness, per Automotive News. > The report calls it an off-road sub-brand, which is kind of > like when Dodge Ram pickups spun off into their own brand. Or > even something like VW's Chinese brand Jetta. > > The new Subaru models, which are set to launch along with the > 2022 Outback, will sport off-road upgrades like higher ground > clearance and off-road tires straight from the dealer. > > But it's not exactly clear whether this is going to be a > distinct brand or if it's an edition of the Outback and Forester > that will sit atop the trim levels. If it is set to be a whole > brand, I think they could have come up with something better > than Wilderness. Maybe something with a space theme, or > something space adjacent, since Subaru is known for its > Pleiades badge. > > Sure, Wilderness is in line with the theme Subaru is going for, > but the two nameplates already have that covered. And it's a > going to feel a little strange referring to a souped-up Subie > as a Wilderness Forester or Wilderness Outback. Or if it's > just a trim, then maybe Wilderness will be tacked on at the > end, like a Wrangler Rubicon. > > But I find it odd, because wilderness is a region among nature. > And a forest is a wooded area outdoors. Uh, I think there's > some overlap there. Same thing with the Outback, though to a > lesser degree. The Outback refers to the remote region of > Australia. So a Wilderness Outback sounds conflicting. The > naming scheme with this sub-brand (or edition) sounds silly. > > But the dealers were clamoring for it and the chairman of the > Subaru National Retailer Advisory Board, Patrick Wergin, said > the new sub-brand is meant to satisfy consumer demand. Wergin > said the following, per Automotive News: > > "We're hoping that the Wilderness edition will attract > consumers that are active lifestyle families and that > do like to go out and maybe do a little bit more > off-roading. We're excited about the opportunity to > have this vehicle capture new clients in the segment." > > Wally Sommer, president of a Subaru dealership in Mequon, > Wisconsin, backed up Wergin, saying: > > "We've had customers asking for, and retailers have > identified the demand for, these more capable > off-road-type vehicles[.] Subaru has responded, and > people are going to be very pleased with the product > when they see it." > > I'm still a little suspicious of the move, but if it gets > drivers excited about the beefier station wagons people insist > on calling CUVs (in the case of the Outback) then by all means > Subaru, go wild. > > > <https://jalopnik.com/subaru-is-spinning-off-with-a-sub-brand-for-the-outback-1846294441> > > > > Sounds like a new package to me, not a spin off brand: https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a35206089/subaru-outback-wilderness-spied/