Re: Dash cams
VanguardLH <[email protected]> Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:57:53 -0600
| Newsgroups | alt.autos.subaru |
|---|---|
| Organization | Usenet Elder |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Cameo <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2/23/2021 7:42 PM, Wade Garrett wrote: >> On 2/22/21 5:34 PM, Cameo wrote: >>> On 2/22/2021 9:28 PM, VanguardLH wrote: >>>> Cameo <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2/14/2021 1:43 PM, VanguardLH wrote: >>>>>> Cameo <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> <SNIP> >>> >>> Smartphones don't have the video looping feature dash cams have. On >>> the other hand, it seems that even the oldest phones can record better >>> videos, especially in the dark, than most dash cams I've seen. I never >>> figured why a dash cam costing a couple hundred $s can't be made with >>> better lenses. The incremental cost couldn't be that much. >>> >> I don't think the lens is the problem- it's the sensor/processor. > > Still, the incremental cost of a better sensor shouldn't be such a > hinderance. As with home security cameras, get one with IR LEDs to see in dim lighting, like before you decide you need headlights. The best sensor won't work unless it has some light to sense. Wide view lets you record more than just straight ahead. The best dash cams aren't cheap. Look at the prices mentioned at https://www.techradar.com/best/best-dash-cam. Up to you whether you take a digital SLR camera on your vacation, or one of those cheap pocket point-n-shoot kiddie cameras. There are price points all over the place depending on what consumers are willing to pay and what quality and features they want. Better quality costs more, and a lot more than just the incremental difference for a "better" sensor since "better" is subjective. It's not just the type of sensor. It's also the size. The larger the sensor, the higher the image quality. Better sensors also have higher pixels density. Along with a better sensor, the logic must handle the higher data volume and at speed. More data at slow speed means so much tearing that the video is likely unusable, especially in a moving car. I'm sure, to you, that a better sensor would only be incrementally more expensive. Doesn't work that way. Plus a marginally better sensor (more pixels, larger sensor, faster processing) means you'll probably not notice a difference. You'll want a much better sensor to be visually "better" to you.