Re: OT: B5 reboot?

On 02/10/2021 10:33, Daniel65 wrote:
> Steveski wrote on 2/10/21 1:53 am:
>> On 01/10/2021 10:44, Daniel65 wrote:
>>> Steveski wrote on 30/9/21 8:33 pm:
>>>> On 30/09/2021 09:12, Daniel65 wrote:
>>>>> Steveski wrote on 30/9/21 10:15 am:
>>>>>> On 29/09/2021 23:55, FP wrote:
>>>>>>> On 27/09/2021 20:15, Kim Wall wrote:
>>>>>>>> <https://deadline.com/2021/09/babylon-5-series-reboot-j-michael-straczynski-development-cw-1234845022/> 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Does this mean that the cast would all have to be about 12?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kim.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fantastic! Something on-topic to talk about?! I may have to start 
>>>>>>> watching television again.
>>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's made me think - it shouldn't OT because it's ON topic . . .
>>>>>>
>>>>> 'OT' can mean 'On Topic' can't it?? ;-P
>>>>
>>>> Yes but, by long tradition, not for this froup.
>>>>
>>> Yeap, I knew as much, hence my Smiley!! ;-)
>>
>> Oops - sense of irony failure on my part.
>>
> Don't you worry about it, Steveski. I'm well aware that a lot of people 
> don't 'get' my sense of humour! ;-P

IIRC Daniel is simply correct.

OT usually meant "off-topic" for most groups, but because everyone was 
talking about everything *but* B5, it is usually used to indicate "On 
topic" here.

Frank