Re: The new border chaos: a crisis of foolish Biden's own making
BeamMeUpScotty <[email protected]> Sat, 13 Mar 2021 09:33:35 -0500
| Newsgroups | alt.society.mental-health,alt.basement.graveyard,alt.california.illegals,sac.politics,alt.politics.democrats,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.guns |
|---|---|
| Organization | Don't feed the animals |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 3/12/21 8:40 PM, Leroy N. Soetoro wrote: > https://nypost.com/2021/03/04/the-new-border-chaos-a-crisis-of-bidens-own- > making/ > > A crisis is a terrible thing to create. This, nonetheless, is what > President Biden has done at the southern border. > > His rhetoric during the campaign suggesting an open-handed approach to > migrants coming to the US, and his early moves to undo Donald Trump’s > border policies, are creating a migrant surge that risks running out of > control. > > Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas says the situation isn’t a > crisis, but “a challenge” — an “acute” and “stressful” challenge with some > “urgency,” but merely a challenge all the same. > > Consider the contours of this challenge. Twice as many people, about > 80,000, tried to cross the border illegally in January of this year as > compared with January a year ago. > > Even though it isn’t peak traveling season yet (that traditionally comes > in May and June), the US Border Patrol has already begun releasing > migrants into US towns on the border. > > Axios reported on a briefing prepared for Biden that warned that the > number of migrant kids is on pace to set a record, and there aren’t nearly > enough beds to accommodate them. > > Biden officials tend to discuss the “push factors,” the conditions that > prompt migrants to flee their countries in Central America. But changing > those underlying conditions, even if doable, is a long-term proposition. > What we have much more direct control over is the “pull factors,” our own > policies and practices that create an incentive to come here. > > Trump had a number of false starts at the border, but, by the end, had > created an entirely reasonable system based on his lawful authorities to > impose order at the border. There is no good reason to rip up much of this > arrangement, though that’s exactly what Biden has done. > > During the pandemic, Trump turned around illegal crossers at the border on > public-health grounds. Biden has created an exception for unaccompanied > minors, which is an obvious incentive for families to send children under > age 18. > > Under Trump, the Migration Protection Protocols, also known as Remain in > Mexico, ended the practice of letting Central American migrants into the > US while their asylum claims were adjudicated. > > This was crucial because, under the old arrangement, asylum seekers were > allowed in while their claims were considered. Even if the claims were > ultimately rejected, as the vast majority of them were, the migrants > overwhelmingly ended up staying anyway. This was a huge magnet to migrants > — get to the border and claim asylum and you’re in the United States, very > likely to stay. > > Biden has trashed the Migrant Protection Protocols. No new asylum seekers > will be enrolled in the program, and the backlog of people who had been > waiting in Mexico are being admitted into the United States. > > He’s also suspended the so-called “safe third-country” agreements that > Trump forged with El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras to get asylum- > seekers to apply in one of those countries. > > The premise of the overall Trump approach was that people who feared for > their lives in their home country because of persecution don’t necessarily > need to come to the United States to escape. It should be enough for them > to go to another country in the region, or if they are indeed applying for > US asylum, to stay in Mexico while doing so. > > Allowing them into the United States, with no reliable internal > enforcement mechanism, constitutes an end-run around our immigration > system. Because migrants, like anyone else, respond to incentives, the > more who are allowed in, the more will come. And, since our resources > aren’t infinite, if enough families show up at the border, it inevitably > overtaxes our personnel and facilities. > > Even if Biden has different priorities, it makes no sense to create a > willy-nilly rush at the border before a supposedly better system is in > place (whatever that might be). > > Mayorkas blames Trump for having “dismantled our nation’s immigration > system in its entirety,” a claim as absurd as the notion that the Biden > administration started from scratch on vaccinations. > > Trump got a handle on the border, which in 2014 and 2019 had spun out of > control. Call it what you will, a crisis or a challenge, but Biden is on a > path to heedlessly repeat this experience. > > Twitter: @RichLowry > > > REMEMBER THIS on the first Tuesday in November 2022.... -- That's karma Banning guns and de-funding police won't lower crime if you follow the Democrats Rhetoric. *And their very own Democrat actions confirm* that even *they believe they're lying* since they're doing the opposite *to* *reduce any crimes "you" might commit against the Government* that they control and apparently they *believe guns and fences and police* *will* *protect* them from your crime and violence. So why won't those same things protect you from crime and violence?