Re: TV Reboot Still MIA, Finale Discourse Back Again, and a New Game Actually Has a Date
Your Name <[email protected]> Sat, 28 Feb 2026 10:48:03 +1300
| Newsgroups | alt.battlestar-galactica |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-02-27 18:08:41 +0000, MummyChunk said: > If anyone's still checking in every few months to see whether the Sam > Esmail Battlestar project ever escaped development purgatory, there's > still nothing resembling a real green light. The last meaningful > movement was that Peacock dropped it and it was supposedly going to be > shopped elsewhere, but since then it's basically been radio silence in > terms of a network actually picking it up and putting it on a schedule. > At this point it feels less like "when" and more like "if," which is a > shame because the franchise is one of the few that could come back > without feeling like nostalgia cosplay if the writing is there. > > Meanwhile, the old arguments about the ending are having another little > flare up, because people are circulating George R R Martin's comments > about the finale again. It's funny how that never really goes away. For > a lot of viewers, the show is still an all time great that just didn't > stick the landing in a way that matched the earlier seasons. For > others, the ending is thematically consistent and the problem is more > about pacing and execution than the idea itself. Personally, the reason > it stays a debate is because the show set an insanely high bar for > grounded, messy, political sci fi and then asked people to accept a > very different kind of resolution at the end. Whether that works > probably depends on what you wanted the story to be about in the first > place. > > The one actually concrete Battlestar thing on the horizon right now is > the new game Battlestar Galactica Scattered Hopes. It's got a planned > release window of Q2 2026, and what they've shown so far looks like > it's trying to blend fleet survival management with more direct combat > than the usual strategy layer games. That could be great or it could > end up feeling like it can't decide whether it wants to be tense and > desperate or just a laser show, but at least it's something new in the > universe that isn't trapped in rights and meetings. > > So that's where things stand today. No real TV revival news, the finale > discourse is immortal, and the game is the only thing with a calendar > attached. If a new series did happen, would people here even want it in > the same continuity as the 2004 show, or is the only way forward a hard > reset with a new tone. The only *true* "Battlestar Galactica" is the original created by Glen A. Larson version. Moore-Ron's awful in-name-only "reboot" is irrelevant garbage as will be any follow-on or another idiotic "reboot" version.