Re: Can't post to rocksolid NNTP - where to get help?
badgolferman <[email protected]> Tue, 7 Mar 2023 16:57:22 -0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | alt.free.newsservers,news.admin.peering,news.software.nntp,alt.bbs |
|---|---|
| Organization | To protect and to server |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
<[email protected]> wrote: > you seem to see the diminishment of Usenet services by ISPs as a result > of a crusade against child porn. Did you receive the letter that AT&T sent to all its cable customers when they killed their NNTP servers? I did. I received that letter. It was bullshit. Pure political bullshit. Stupid people believed it. Oh, AT&T. They care so much for the kiddies. They're saving them. They "teamed up" with the NY sleazebag Cuomo trying to make a name for himself as "a good guy with simple solutions" to very complex problems. If you ask me why they teamed up with that NY sleazebag Cuomo, I suspect you already know that answer based on what you wrote below, in fact. > i think it had far more to do with broadband allowing for increased > volume of bandwidth thus network, hardware, and administrative costs of > hosting news servers significantly went up and fast and the child porn > issue was merely a convenient excuse of ISPs to shut them down and > save money. I agree. You could actually tell, in those days, how little they supported NNTP servers because their instructions came with POP3/IMAP4 setup instructions, but you had to call and go up a few support levels to get their NNTP server setups. I'm not an employee of a cable company but I suspect they inherited the NNTP setup just as they inherited the POP3/IMAP4 setup, and they weren't expecting the explosion in NNTP data, particularly I guess in binaries. I don't actually know much about their business model, but what I did know at the time was that dropping _all_ of Usenet was too simple of a solution. >> You don't see that as a phony issue? > > No. Whenever you see a politician (or a company, as in the case of AT&T), propose a too-simple solution to a rather complex problem, there's a good chance there's a _lot_ more to the issue than they are pretending it to be. You can use Prohibition, as one (currently non-contentious) example, but let's not stray too far into politics since the topic is free news servers. I can't get Rocksolid to work even though they gave me credentials. I tried every news server setting proposed so far in this newsgroup. rocksolidbbs.com:119 rocksolidbbs.com:563 news.novabbs.org:119 news.novabbs.org:563 None work for me. (login/password supplied by <[email protected]> RetroBBS Registration) Do any of those server:port combinations work at all for you?