Re: "Arizona tells Biden it won't tear down its border wall"

On 10/22/22 8:34 AM, David Hartung wrote:
> On 10/21/22 20:46, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>> David Hartung <[email protected]> wrote in
>> news:[email protected]:
>>
>>> On 10/21/22 16:10, Siri Cruise wrote:
>>>> In article <[email protected]>,
>>>>    David Hartung <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> There is much I don't know about this issue, but if any containers
>>>>> are n private property, my guess is that the property owners
>>>>> approve.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.fox10phoenix.com/news/tribe-says-arizona-built-shippin
>>>> g-container-border-wall-against-its-wishes
>>>>
>>>> SAN DIEGO (AP) - The Cocopah Indian Tribe said Friday that the
>>>> state of Arizona acted against its wishes by stacking shipping
>>>> containers on its land to prevent illegal border crossings.
>>>>
>>>> The tribe determined that the state put 42 double-stacked
>>>> containers on its land near Yuma, said Michael Fila from its
>>>> office of emergency management.
>>>>
>>>> The tribe wrote state officials Tuesday to inform them of their
>>>> findings and concerns. Fila said the containers block half of a
>>>> two-lane road, closing a "vital evacuation route."
>>>
>>> That is between the state and the tribe, not between the state and the
>>> Federal government.
>>
>>
>>       The tribal land is not state land.
>>
>>       The state trespassed on that land
>> to make their barrier.
>>
>>       Do you approve of that?
>>
>>> Of course, there is also the question of whether or not an Indian
>>> tribal government is a private landowner.
>>
>>        It is not state land. The state
>> screwed up. Would it kill you to admit
>> that?
> 
> As I don't have all the facts, I am withholding an opinion on that 
> particular aspect of the situation. I will only say that if the 
> containers been placed by a liberal Democrat, you would be singing a far 
> different tune.

Maybe the State should build a wall all the way around the Tribal land 
to the State Borders...  and just create check points to stop access 
into the State by the NON U.S. and/or Arizona Citizens

Access to State owned Property can also be limited.  It can also be 
Quarantined...  by a Governor so say the Democrats.  Would the Democrats 
now prove themselves wrong and prove they lied to America?


If the Reservation is inside the State then the State has a border 360 
degrees around the reservation being as it isn't part of the State. 
Otherwise it's *NOT* inside the States and it's Contiguous with the 
Federal Border and it isn't inside Arizona at all it would be more like 
D.C and be a piece of land carved out by the U.S. Constitution. Like 
D.C. it would be a special piece of real estate that ONLY congress over 
sees for the specific reasons required by the Constitution, otherwise 
it's under the normal Constitutional provisions and Federal laws. 
Congress nor the President can supersede the Constitution with a 
legislative Federal law or an act or proclamation thanks to the 
SUPREMACY CLAUSE.  The U.S. Constitution is the SUPREME
law.



-- 
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-That's Karma-

*IF YOU'RE READING THIS YOU ARE A SURVIVOR*
*The first rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is we talk about it, we hate 
censorship. Never trust what Democrats or Marxists tell you. Make them 
prove it with actual verifiable facts and science. And if you didn't 
find the duplicitous lies in what the Marxist-Democrats told you then 
you didn't dig deep enough. The *Gruber* *Doctrine* is the 
Marxist-Democrat plan that says it's "to the Democrats advantage to have 
a lack of transparency and then lie about everything".
https://rumble.com/vkt8ld-call-it-the-stupidity-of-the-american-voter-or-whatever.-how-libs-exploit-t.html

*The next rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is
86 - "Our constitution protects criminals, sexual deviants and U.S. 
Senators.... which at times are, one and the same."

Think Senator Joe Biden the Pedophile.