Re: What part of the U.S. Constitution makes...
BeamMeUpScotty <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.politics.congress,alt.politics.corruption,alt.censorship,alt.politics.economics,alt.politics.election,alt.politics.misc,alt.politics.obama,alt.politics.scorched-earth,alt.politics.socialism.mao,alt.politics.trump,alt.global-warming,alt.conspiracy,alt.apocolypse,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.infowars, alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,alt.politics.guns |
|---|---|
| Organization | Support the "Propaganda Wars Open Source Project" to encourage less violence and hate inside America's Borders. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/8/22 10:26 AM, [email protected] wrote: > On Tuesday, November 8, 2022 at 10:14:14 AM UTC-5, BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >> https://www.infowars.com/posts/un-tells-elon-musk-to-monitor-harmful-disinformation-and-hate-speech >> =========================================================== >> >> >> >> What part of the U.S. Constitution makes FREEDOM of speech the delegated >> power of the United Nations? > > What part of the US Constitution says that an American company operating globally across international boundaries can do whatever it wants to do under the US Constitution, which is null and void in those countries that the company operates in? The Constitution is not a license for any company to do whatever it wants to do when operating outside US boundaries. Fuck, but damn, you're stupid. > Then you're suggesting that the United Nations is wanting to limit a United States corporation that offers a "service" internationally rather than allowing the individual INTERNATIONAL NATIONS to limit their own citizens? Is the United Nations speaking on behalf of a vote that suggests all NATIONS agree and want to have their free speech set by Marxist NATIONS? I'm all for each of those NATIONS telling TWITTER to meet their legal and Constituional standards but the UN isn't delegated the unilatteral power to tell TWITTER or other Corporation to meet their international standards of speech. Something tells that over 200 nations will have almost 200 perspectives on what free speech is, in the UNited State it decided by the Constitution and if the UN wants it changed, they can blow it out their ass. Because it take 3/4 of the U.S. States to ratify that Amendment. The U.N. has ZERO power to change our Constitution. *Article V* The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall *propose* Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, *when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths* *of* *the several States* , *or by Conventions in three fourths thereof* , as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate. -- -That's karma- - - - - - - To a hammer... every Democrat looks like a nail.