Re: Amazon to lay off 10,000 employees in preparation for tech downturn

On 11/16/22 10:29 AM, Phil Omdahl wrote:
> On every date, #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty, brain-damaged fucktard who rode 
> his scooter into a tree while not wearing a helmet, stupidly bawled and 
> lied:
> 
>> On 11/16/22 4:41 AM, zinn wrote:
>>> Amazon intends to lay off thousands of workers in what some call the 
>>> most
>>> significant round of cuts in the company's history.
>>>
>>> The company will lay off an estimated 10,000 workers in corporate and
>>> technology jobs starting as soon as this week, according to the New York
>>> Times. The jobs account for roughly 3% of Amazon's workforce. Other tech
>>> companies are making similar cuts in preparation for an expected 
>>> economic
>>> downturn in the industry.
>>>
>>> The job cuts are expected to focus on Amazon's devices department and 
>>> its
>>> retail and human resources division. Amazon had alluded to future 
>>> layoffs
>>> when it froze corporate hiring in early November.
>>>
>>> The layoffs also arrive less than a month before the holidays, when the
>>> company sees a surge in business. The job losses will also not affect 
>>> the
>>> company's warehouse hiring plans, which include adding more than 150,000
>>> jobs over the holidays.
>>>
>>> Amazon is not the first Big Tech company to lay off workers this fall.
>>> Facebook parent Meta laid off more than 11,000 workers last week while
>>> providing extensive benefits.
>>>
>>> Twitter also cut an estimated 3,700 workers last week under the 
>>> leadership
>>> of its new owner, Elon Musk.
>>>
>>> The financial tech company Stripe announced Thursday that it had laid 
>>> off
>>> more than 1,000 employees in preparation for "leaner times."
>>>
>>> The ride-sharing company Lyft announced that it was laying off 13% of 
>>> its
>>> staff, citing a "probable recession."
>>>
>>> https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/technology/amazon-to-lay-off-10- 
>>>
>>> 000-employees
>>>
>> The irony is that's the Democrats planning to destroy the U.S. economy 
> 
> The Democrats are not "planning" on destroying the American economy.  
> They're trying to prevent the Republiscums/QAnon from executing *their* 
> plan to destroy it.
> 
Proving that the Democrats knew that if Democrats stole enough elections 
to keep some power, the ECONOMY was going to crash into a DEPRESSION 
caused by those Democrats.

They had it all planned and were just waiting to pull the pin on that 
grenade...

And now that they stole the election the Democrats are prepared to 
initiate that first step of ECONOMIC DISASTER PREPPING.

Notice they waited until the day after the election to spring that 
little nugget of REALITY on their DEMOCRAT employees that were being 
retained solely so they would vote Democrat before they were thrown 
under the bus by the Democrat elites.

I wonder how it feels to work for ONE OF THE DEMOCRATS GENERLS of 
Democrat propaganda and used as cannon fodder and a pawn.


Do you think they all feel like they were played by some Billionaire 
Democrat wanting to steal the food from their mouths?
-- 
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-That's Karma-

*IF YOU'RE READING THIS YOU ARE A SURVIVOR*
*The first rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is we talk about it, we hate 
censorship. Never trust what Democrats or Marxists tell you. Make them 
prove it with actual verifiable facts and science. And if you didn't 
find the duplicitous lies in what the Marxist-Democrats told you then 
you didn't dig deep enough. The *Gruber* *Doctrine* is the 
Marxist-Democrat plan that says it's "to the Democrats advantage to have 
a lack of transparency and then lie about everything".
https://rumble.com/vkt8ld-call-it-the-stupidity-of-the-american-voter-or-whatever.-how-libs-exploit-t.html

*The next rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is
221 - We should stop calling them all 'Entitlements'.
Welfare, Food Stamps, WIC, are not entitlements. They are 
taxpayer-funded handouts, and shouldn't be called entitlements at all. 
Social Security and Veterans Benefits are Entitlements because the 
people receiving them are entitled to them. They were earned and paid 
for by the recipients.