There are no Constitutional gun laws on THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP and BEAR ARMS.

https://nworeport.me/2022/11/28/sen-murphy-calls-for-defunding-law-enforcement-who-refuse-to-enforce-gun-laws/
=================================================


There are no Constitutional gun laws on THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP 
and BEAR ARMS.

*Amendment II*
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free 
State, *the right of the people to keep and bear Arms* , shall not be 
infringed.

That "RIGHT to keep and bear" is sacrosanct.

It is NOT a power delegated to the United States and it is being DENIED 
to the States by the FACT that the Amendment pronounces it THE RIGHT OF 
THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS, as a *RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE* , which 
denied it as a power to the several or individual States. Expressed by 
Amendment 10.

*Amendment X*
The powers *not delegated to the United States* by the Constitution, nor 
*prohibited by it to the States* , *are reserved* to the States 
*respectively* , or *to the people* .

Which leaves the RIGHT to KEEP and BEAR in the hands of "WE THE PEOPLE".


No State ban or Federal Ban is possible on any "arms".  And arms are 
anything that has ever been issued as arms for self defense by the U.S. 
Government and the U.S. Government is required to stop the States from 
banning any "arms" that they have ever issue to their own employees 
soldiers and personal security teams to use for their own protection... 
because they are all arms that you can also KEEP and BEAR as your own 
ARMS.

The list of arms is the LIVING HISTORY of ARMS, there is no room for 
Government to infringe on that RIGHT. What has been done in the past by 
the Government and will be done in the future when issuing arms as 
personal protection equipment "a euphemism for arms" will join the list 
of obviously acceptable arms, because what the government uses as arms 
for personal protection is obviously "arms" and we have a RIGHT to keep 
and bear those arms.  Others may need to be decided in courts if they 
aren't and never were used or labeled as arms by the government.  Things 
like hammers... are they tools or arms?

Pelosi being attacked by a gay prostitute with a hammer brings up the 
question of was the crime of the Prostitute armed assault or just 
assault?  Does having a hammer equate to being armed or is it a "WEAPON 
of Convenience"?  I don't see a hammer as being protected by the RIGHT 
to KEEP and BEAR ARMS. So how could the prostitute have been "armed"? He 
was using a weapon of convenience to assault, essentially making it more 
than a bare hand fist fight type of assault.



That's one for the courts.

-- 
-Reality Matters-