Re: Laws have to *TARGET* the duly convicted who were given due process and NOT all the innocent people who have committed no crimes.
BeamMeUpScotty <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.politics.congress,alt.politics.corruption,alt.censorship,alt.politics.economics,alt.politics.election,alt.politics.misc,alt.politics.obama,alt.politics.scorched-earth,alt.politics.socialism.mao,alt.politics.trump,alt.global-warming,alt.conspiracy,alt.apocolypse,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.infowars, alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,alt.politics.guns |
|---|---|
| Organization | Support the "Propaganda Wars Open Source Project" to encourage less violence and hate inside America's Borders. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/29/22 12:33 PM, Mr. B1ack wrote: > On every date, #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty, brain-damaged fucktard who rode > his scooter into a tree while not wearing a helmet, stupidly bawled and > lied: > >> https://www.breitbart.com/2nd-amendment/2022/11/28/gun-boom-continues-fbi-ran-192749-background-checks-black-friday/ >> >> =========================================== >> >> >> Violating the 13th Amendment and > > Here's #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty, brain-damaged fucktard who rode his > scooter into a tree while not wearing a helmet, bullshitting about the > Constitution again. Time to go take a dump. > You forgot the 5th amendment Due process it's similar to the 13th Amendment duly convicted clause. They both tell you that Liberty and our RIGHTS are NOT able to be suspended without due process and/or being duly convicted. That includes treating a person that has no "probable cause" that would get a warrant issued for a search, to be forced to undergo a search that you run to punish those already duly convicted by due process. When you punish the duly convicted criminal, it doesn't mean you can include the people who had no due process and no conviction with the same law. What you must have meant to say was that "yes I'm right" and the delegated power is not there to infringe on the 2nd and certainly NOT by treating the HARD WORKING innocent Americans who committed no crime, as if they committed a crime like the criminals that were given due process and then found guilty by those innocent Americans on the jury.... Seems odd that Democrats would demand that the Jury suffer the same punishment as the person they convict during the due process. YOU Democrats think that the jury is as guilty as the person on trial and that the Jury should be forced to get a background check the same as the person that the jury decided was guilty of a crime... so they end up in the same list and with the same loss of RIGHTS with their RIGHTS being infringed as the criminal who committed the crime and lost their RIGHT to own a firearm. But like the DRUGS and CARTELS that Democrats can't stop at the border the Democrats also can't stop guns from being used by criminals... the proof is in the numbers, about 50 people shot almost every weekend in Democrat run Chicago. If the background checks work, where did all those criminals get guns? Which means the end game is to make it more difficult for the NON criminals to get guns because the Criminals seem to be doing OK and have easy access to their supply of drugs and guns... thanks to Democrats other policies. -- -Reality Matters-