Re: If true then all Joe Biden needs to do is point out in the Constitution where he gets the delegated power to limit
BeamMeUpScotty <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.politics.congress,alt.politics.corruption,alt.censorship,alt.politics.economics,alt.politics.election,alt.politics.misc,alt.politics.obama,alt.politics.scorched-earth,alt.politics.socialism.mao,alt.politics.trump,alt.global-warming,alt.conspiracy,alt.apocolypse,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.infowars, alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,alt.politics.guns,alt.politics,talk.politics.guns |
|---|---|
| Organization | Support the "Propaganda Wars Open Source Project" to encourage less violence and hate inside America's Borders. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/29/22 4:18 PM, Mr. B1ack wrote: > On 11/29/2022 11:23 AM, Scout wrote: >> >> >> "Mr. B1ack" <bykkker@dogshit~rag.nut> wrote in message >> news:[email protected]... >>> On 11/29/2022 6:14 AM, Scout wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Wotawonderfulworld" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>> news:[email protected]... >>>>> [email protected] wrote in >>>>> news:3g60ohthk1u39ntg98f0r6u8fqhp9vdm4c@ >>>>> 4ax.com: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 24 Nov 2022 05:16:50 GMT, Wotawonderfulworld <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Er you guys can carry Nukes ? Wow i thought the Amendment meant >>>>>>> ARMS not >>>>>>> Weapons. Mini Guns for all. >>>>>> >>>>>> "arms" = "armaments"? >>>>>> >>>>>> Swill >>>>> >>>>> What exactly does this mean ? Hand Guns, Rifles, Machine Guns, >>>>> Shoulder >>>>> fired Rocket Launchers, All seems a little vague.. Or is that what its >>>>> suppose to be. >>>> >>>> The whole world seems to be a little vague to you..... >>>> >>>> But luckily I can help you out with that. >>>> >>>> https://www.merriam-webster.com/ >>>> >>> >>> A dictionary will not tell you what the inherent limits of the right >>> are, scooter. >> >> Well, first you would have to understand what those words mean, only >> then can you discuss them. > > That's a run-on sentence. I know what the words mean, and literate > people, like me, don't need dictionaries to know what they mean. > >> >> >>> >>> You don't have a right to just whatever arms you may wish to have, >>> scooter. This is settled, scooter. >> >> Sure I do. > > No, scooter, you don't. > >> It may not currently be legally recognized but that doesn't mean I >> wont have them if I decide I will. > > You don't have a right to them, scooter. > >> >> Free Hint: Ninth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of >> America. > > No bearing here, scooter. > >> >> I mean heck, you've been wrong so many times about what arms the >> Constitution doesn't cover > > The Constitution has nothing to say about covered or uncovered arms, > scooter. The Constitution only enumerates the right, scooter. It > doesn't say what the right *is*. Here is the formal text of the > amendment, scooter, followed by the actual meaning: > > Text: > A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free > State, > the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. > > Actual meaning: > A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free > State, > the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, *whatever that right > is*, > *which is not herein defined*, shall not be infringed. > > The right is not defined in the amendment, scooter. If you weren't such > a stupid pig-headed fuckwit, you would know that. > > >> Heck, I remember when you said only the militia had a right to arms > > No, scooter, you don't remember that, because I never said that, > scooter. You lied again, scooter. > You should look back to what arms were in 1776.... They actually knew what arms were and today we have 250 years of government precedence as to what they are by what the Government has been issuing to their *armed* GOVERNMENT workers in the FBI/CIA and IRS BATF/CBP the Secret Service and military soldiers for personal protection, and what ever they have as arms is obviously the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR, AS ARMS. Plus the myriad of other private arms used over 250 years and the new ones created by the private sector that can be kept and carried by a person needing some kind of self defense equal to that of other people be they private persons or Government persons or even Military persons. In short, we have a living list plus any new things NOT in the precedence that as they say "passes muster" and is used by people as self defense while hunting or doing Government work or Military or secret service personal security arms paid for by tax payers to keep Democrats safe... and/or any of the others that I missed and didn't mention. -- -Reality Matters-