Re: LGBT intolerance

On 12/1/22 10:32 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
> On 12/1/2022 6:58 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>> Josh Rosenbluth <[email protected]> wrote in news:tmbkqp$2th0s$2@dont-
>> email.me:
>>
>>> On 12/1/2022 2:11 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 18:57:51 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
>>>>> On 11/30/2022 6:52 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>> Josh Rosenbluth <[email protected]> wrote
>>>>>>> On 11/30/2022 10:54 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>> David Hartung <[email protected]> wrote
>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/22 11:28, Lee wrote:
>>>>>>>> All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal
>>>>>>>> enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges,
>>>>>>>> advantages, and accommodations of any place of public
>>>>>>>> accommodation, as defined in this section, without
>>>>>>>> discrimination or segregation on the ground of race,
>>>>>>>> color, ------> religion <-------- or national origin.
>>>>
>>>> That refers to religion as a protected class.  That is, Catholics may
>>>> choose not to do business with divorced or gay people just for being
>>>> divorced or gay.  But nobody may discriminate against a Catholic just
>>>> because they're Catholic.
>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/2000a
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Be careful. Federal law also provides for explicit protection for
>>>>>>> religiously-motivated conduct.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/2000bb-1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         "We don't serve your kind" is not
>>>>>> a exercise of religion.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is if serving them makes you complicit in sin (in the opinion of
>> the
>>>>> business owner).
>>>>
>>>> Where did Jesus say it was ok to treat homos like shit?
>>>
>>> It doesn't matter what Jesus said. A religious belief is in the eye of
>>> the beholder.
>>>
>>
>>
>>     So any violation of civil rights is
>> legal as long as the perpetrator CLAIMS
>> a religious belief?
> 
> Not just violation of civil rights, which is largely a civil matter, but 
> violation of *any* law, criminal or civil.  Whether he realizes it or 
> not, the slimy Jew sophist has just said that a person claiming a 
> "religious belief" is entitled to violate any law he wishes to violate.
> 

Actually "Religious belief" is protected by the 1st Amendment 100%, the 
problem arises when someone is accused of a crime while exercising a 
Religious belief....  Actions are NOT protected 100%, there are crimes 
set forth by NON religious laws like MURDER laws that don't target 
religion that isn't allowed even for religious exercise to be acted upon 
when it's a religious belief such as human sacrifice.

But any law that's short of violating others RIGHTS like the RIGHTS to 
life and liberty and property... For instance protection of the person 
from themselves as in the PROHIBITION amendment that banned alcohol for 
human consumption, they didn't ban RELIGION from things like sacramental 
wine.

And Payote for use in NATIVE AMERICAN Religious rituals... because it's 
NOT infringing on the RIGHTS of others.

There's that Common theme in the U.S. Constitution again, the one that 
suggests that NO ONE NOT EVEN THE GOVERNMENT CAN INFRINGE ON OUR RIGHTS 
unless and until it's violating the RIGHTS of another person...




As with gays and trans delusional belief they aren't heterosexuals, yet 
they have no proof of that. Unless and until they violate others RIGHTS 
it's NOT really an issue of law, but when gays make laws that do violate 
others RIGHT to their own beliefs... it becomes an issue of violating my 
rights with laws that are telling me what to believe. It can go either 
way the people violating others RIGHTS or The Government violating 
others RIGHTS by passing laws that are NOT within The Government's 
jurisdiction because they have no delegated power to pass them. Like 
laws about firearms... where is that delegated power?

The laws can't say that heterosexuals have RIGHTS particular to 
heterosexuals so they also can't say that NON heterosexuals have RIGHTS, 
because there is no FACT or DNA to prove that their RIGHTS are linked to 
their hetero or homo sexual self image in their own head.  It's 
apparently NOT the measure of a person according to the Supreme Court 
that says abortion is OK... but a baby might have a homosexual self 
image as the LGBTQ tell us they're born gay or born a trans. Which means 
that if that gay or trans self image makes them a person, then all the 
human life in the uterus are persons including the hetero persons and 
absolutely under the 5th Amendments due process RIGHTS in connection to 
their medically discharged execution.

A heterosexual self image is meant to be fulfilling the NATURAL instinct 
of procreation, but if you deviate from that and your self image 
violates those laws of NATURE for procreation, then your self image is 
abnormal. And as with other mental illness and genetic brain issues are 
abnormal like autism, it doesn't make them a person or a new type of 
person, simply a person with mental issues.

That indicates a mental illness and mental illness is often accompanied 
by delusions that the brain uses to compensate for those mental issues. 
Delusions to help you NOT admit your problem and to keep you trying to 
succeed. Which is why gays are scared and have a fear and over 
compensate or lash out against people and try to tell us that all men 
are gay, it's the fear of not being NORMAL setting in and they start 
spewing delusional things to make themselves and their mentally ill mind 
feel it's normal. Because if you aren't NORMAL the only way to solve 
that is to make the abnormal appear to be normal and/or make everything 
including the normal into abnormal in you own mind.

So they make up and live in delusional worlds where all men are gay, and 
that makes them feel less crazy.

But as long as they don't violate the RIGHTS of others as it is shown 
all through and in the body of work in the Constitution, no one has the 
power to limit you.  Gay sex or hetero, or praying or drinking the Holy 
Wine... NOT my problem, but when you start to force me to believe in 
your delusions by passing laws to interfere with my RIGHTS, that's when 
you're NOW violating my RIGHTS to believe and do what I want.

-- 
-Reality Matters-