Democrats wanted SMART-GUNS.... How smart is too smart?
BeamMeUpScotty <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.politics.congress,alt.politics.corruption,alt.censorship,alt.politics.economics,alt.politics.election,alt.politics.misc,alt.politics.obama,alt.politics.scorched-earth,alt.politics.socialism.mao,alt.politics.trump,alt.global-warming,alt.conspiracy,alt.apocolypse,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.infowars, alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,alt.politics.guns |
|---|---|
| Organization | Support the "Propaganda Wars Open Source Project" to encourage less violence and hate inside America's Borders. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/make-way-killer-robots-government-expanding-its-power-kill ------------------------------------- I see a problem that makes this illegal.... Murder is illegal and only in SELF DEFENSE can someone kill another person. According to DUE PROCESS. And the ROBOT has ZERO RIGHTS to self defense since it can't be protecting it's own life and is never in danger of being killed so it can't claim self defense. And that makes it the Manufacturer and the user who are guilty of the murder of a human being. To argue it saved some person's life being as that person has a RIGHT to life and due process is NOT even the same one as a person deciding to save another, the machine can't be punished under due process because it has no RIGHTS and thus no RIGHT to protect its self or others with LETHAL FORCE. I see many law suits and a great deal of criminal prosecutions of the people that arm a robot and designate it's task as killing or "pacifying" humans. Someone will have to go to prison for the manslaughter just as they do for DRUNK DRIVING killers who set that car in motion. The gun manufacturer isn't the one because they sell the guns for human use, if they make it for a robot to us then they accept the criminal and financial liability when the ROBOT uses it. I'm going to predict the idea of armed robots will be deemed the same as booby-traps used to kill or injure people in private residences and by civilian authorities, but like land mines and anti-ship mines they may prove legal for military use. Unless they are the new military/militia troops "arms" then Civilians could also own them as "arms" like semiautomatic and full automatic *firearms* that will be called *SMART ARMS* that the 2nd Amendment would then protect as the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR SMART-ARMS, just as it now protects the RIGHT to keep and bear fire-arms as arms. Democrats wanted SMART-GUNS.... How smart is too smart? Walking and talking and killing is NOT really all that smart for a person or a gun. Will the "ARMS" be limited to Muzzle Loaders that could reload in less than a second or only 6 rounds in a semi-auto magazine carrying robot that can change to a new magazine in less than two seconds and carry thousands of rounds in hundreds of 6 cartridge magazines...? What ever the military uses as "arms" for a soldier's common use, will be "arms" protected for use by WE THE PEOPLE, even an AI automated semi auto gun that is self propelled and used by soldiers like personal defense drones in their back pack that are weaponized... they become "arms" as they are common use for personal protection and survival arms for the soldiers and police and used for security for politicians personal protection. -- -Reality Matters-