Re: Gun Control means Crime Control
BeamMeUpScotty <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | talk.politics.guns,alt.politics.congress,alt.politics.corruption,alt.censorship,alt.politics.economics,alt.politics.election,alt.politics.misc,alt.politics.obama,alt.politics.scorched-earth,alt.politics.socialism.mao,alt.politics.trump,alt.global-warming,alt.conspiracy,alt.apocolypse,alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.infowars,alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,alt.politics.guns,alt.atheism |
|---|---|
| Organization | Support the "Propaganda Wars Open Source Project" to encourage less violence and hate inside America's Borders. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 12/9/22 11:20 AM, Max Boot wrote: > On 12/9/2022 4:48 AM, scooter lied: >> >> >> "Skeeter" <[email protected]> wrote in message >> news:[email protected]... >>> In article <[email protected]>, >>> [email protected] says... >>>> >>>> "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>> news:[email protected]: >>>> >>>> >>>> > >>>> > So while the militia SHOULD be well regulated.. our rights do not >>>> > depend on that being the case. If anything it would be a basis for a >>>> > suit against the government for failing to insure that everyone >>>> has or >>>> > is provided a gun. >>>> >>>> >>>> The government has a duty to supply >>>> everyone with a gun? >>> >>> >>> He didn't say that. Why do you liberals always spin shit around? >> >> So you agree the 2nd doesn't exist only to arm the government militia. > > No, that is *exactly* the reason the *amendment* exists, scooter. > Remember, scooter: the amendment does not define or create the right. > But maintaining the armed slave patrols, aka "militias," was indeed the > sole purpose of the amendment. > Actually it says: *Amendment II* A well regulated Militia, *being necessary to the security of a free* *State* , the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. The only thing the RIGHT of the people is discussed as protecting in the 2nd Amendment is the "FREE STATE* and it does that with a militia... made possible by, the RIGHT of the people, which is protected by denying that power to the individual States and stopping Federal infringements with *shall not be infringed* . It's obviously the RIGHT of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms that by the process of logic, is responsible for keeping that free state (created by the Constitution) a "free state" of the people. The arms are NOT for the militia but they are available to the militia "with" the people who keep and bear the arms when the people are called to arms by the government and militia to protect the free state. It's a multi tiered and interdependent security fail-safe. Without any one of the powers and/or RIGHTS being discussed, the system will trigger a fail-over to the next level until it's failed to the point that it's every person for themselves. At that point it's basic survival. Which means the process has an embedded the fail-over to result in guaranteeing our *RIGHT to self defense* exists to the end of the Government and beyond, because you have that RIGHT to keep and bear arms NOT to the end of the GOVERNMENT but until you die. -- -Reality Matters-