If abortion is a "Religious Subject" that crazy religious people have as part of a faith based religious belief...
BeamMeUpScotty <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.politics.congress,alt.politics.corruption,alt.censorship,alt.politics.economics,alt.politics.election,alt.politics.misc,alt.politics.obama,alt.politics.scorched-earth,alt.politics.socialism.mao,alt.politics.trump,alt.global-warming,alt.conspiracy,alt.apocolypse,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.infowars, alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,alt.politics.guns |
|---|---|
| Organization | Support the "Propaganda Wars Open Source Project" to encourage less violence and hate inside America's Borders. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
https://nworeport.me/2022/12/11/senate-democrats-hatch-plan-to-subsidize-abortion-travel-during-the-lame-duck-session/ ------------------------------------------------------ If abortion is a "Religious Subject" that crazy religious people have as part of a faith based religious belief, why do Democrat tell us it is, and then tell us it's legally based in science and that the secular science and logic has the evidence to prove it's NOT a religious belief but that they have the science to prove that the human life in the uterus is NOT a "live human" from conception, according to science.... Then how can Democrats start by saying religious wackos believe and then they later claim that they can subsidize the antithesis of that religious belief with TAX DOLLARS and violate the "Congress shall make no law" clause on religion. Isn't that GOVERNMENT declaring that their government beliefs of RELIGION shows other religions are false religions unless they agree with the Government's religious belief, without any science or facts or logic to support that government claim their claim is a belief and it's selecting a religious belief to support? To spend tax money requires a law. And Congress can make no law that undermines any religion and thereby is elevating some other religion to become the officially accepted Government religious belief. If the government were to present facts in court proving that it's NOT spending money on a "religious" belief by proving that the human life in the uterus is NOT in fact a human life in the uterus that is protected by the 5th Amendment or the 13th Amendment due process or Duly Convicted clauses using facts and evidence, they would win the Supreme court case that it's NOT a conspiring to commit murder and using tax dollars to execute a human life which is protected by due process and that prevents the government from engaging in funding any part of the execution of that life since it committed no crime and has not received due process. And as a religious belief that the human life is alive from conception is as valid as the government's unfounded assumption and belief that there is NO life after conception, until birth. -- -Reality Matters- https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/12/09/elise-stefanik-twitter-lied-to-congress-about-shadow-banning-conservatives/ ------------------------------------------------------- And TWITTER and the FBI lied about working together as a part of the SHADOW GOVERNMENT to limit free speech. They became the *Ministry of TRUTH* that was run by the *SHADOW* *GOVERNMENT* . For those out there that said *the SHADOW GOVERNMENT is tinfoil hat* *territory* ...you better stock up on tinfoil.