They didn't have the evidence but they *felt certain* that there was evidence...

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/alan-dershowitz-jan-6-panels-criminal-referral-trump-clearly-unconstitutional

"we chose to advance the names of people where we felt certain that 
there was abundant evidence that they had participated in crimes"
-----------------------------------------------


"advance the names of people where we felt certain that there was 
abundant evidence"

They didn't have the evidence but they *felt certain* that there was 
evidence...  is that a new standard for prosecution, can they feel that 
someone is guilty and then just declare them guilty? Where is the 
evidence and the warrant and/or probable cause?

You can't investigate a crime where there is no probable cause supported 
by Oath or affirmation or a warrant or something to legally trigger that 
prosecution.  And isn't it against the law to maliciously report a crime 
where none was committed just to damage a persons life?

*Jussie Smolette* is the poster boy for FAKING CRIMINAL CHARGES and 
trying to FRAME their enemies.

Shouldn't the Jan/6 committee be charged with falsely accusing TRUMP of 
crimes with no evidence and attempting to use the justice system as a 
WEAPON to use to attack their self described enemy.

/-> *ADDENDUM*
Jan/6 committee came up with an unproven Conspiracy theory and used it 
as evidence like the Democrats and Congress did with the *TRUMP/RUSSIA* 
*dossier* that was also FAKE and a conspiracy theory that was never proven.

But we do have Obama on a video conspiring with PUTIN to undermine an 
election by calling on PUTIN to play nice until after the election and 
then Obama can betray the American voters.  That was an OBAMA/RUSSIA 
conspiracy to commit VOTER FRAUD and TREASON.

Obama on an open mic telling Medvedev to tell Putin he can be more 
flexible after the election.

https://rumble.com/embed/v5ljrt/?pub=4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0mgQaFlo_p8

The irony here is that Congress actually had "hard evidence" of Obama 
using an election to undermine American voters while making deals for 
pay to play (I'll do for you later if you do for me now so I can get 
elected) and that was an election crime and since it was a secret 
bargain with the enemy to undermine the voters *it was TREASON* .

Democrats seem to love Conspiracy theories when they use them to gain 
power, when they want to win an election or use them to ban free speech 
of their political opposition.  Which shows Democrats to be CORRUPT LIARS.
*END ADDENDUM* <-/

It's a very transparent attempt to stop TRUMP from running... and 
Congress can't violate laws... and laws apply to them unless they are 
specifically and unequally exempted. Which means that any attempt to 
exempt Congress alone is a violation of the equal protection clause that 
protects TRUMP from unequal treatment by the people in congress while 
making laws or in the process of making or exercising their 
congressional authority.

Which means that in reality they can't exempt themselves from any laws. 
It's a bit ironic that they break the law by ignoring the Constitutional 
clause that they beat us over the head with daily when that clause 
applies only to the GOVERNMENTS actions NOT ours..

*Amendment XIV*
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and 
subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States 
and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any 
law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the 
United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, 
or property, without due process of law; *nor deny to any person within* 
*its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws* .


THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE, suggests that if Congress exempts it's self 
from laws then it violates the equal RIGHTS clause that is there for all 
of us to attain equal protection.  The people who are exempt become more 
protected by the same laws that deny us the ability to seek equal justice.

They can't accuse someone of a crime and have it investigated without 
facing the same kind of justice that other people who accuse people of 
crimes to try to FRAME them for personal, financial or political 
reasons.  The attempt to use the legal system as a weapon is a crime 
even when it's the FBI/DOJ that the committee members are attempting to 
mislead and to use to falsely accuse someone of a crime without having 
the evidence to be called "probable cause" with a witness under oath or 
a warrant from a judge.

They admit that they only feel like TRUMP committed a crime, except 
their feelings aren't the measure of criminal law and probable cause, 
ask a cop if their feelings are in the legal definition of acceptable 
reasons for probable cause?

DO they arrest a White Cop that shoots a Black man, because the cop felt 
certain that the black man had a gun?  Democrats tell us that the Cop 
wasn't legally permitted to shoot unless the cop was positive that s/he 
saw the gun pointed in their direction.

Can't shoot them in the back running away with no gun.... and claim you 
"felt certain" they were threatening your life.

The Committee members that signed that letter to the DOJ need to be 
investigated and charged like Jussie Smolette for trying to initiate an 
investigation/prosecution without any evidence of a crime. But in their 
case, it's abuse of power.

-- 
-Reality Matters-

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/12/09/elise-stefanik-twitter-lied-to-congress-about-shadow-banning-conservatives/
-------------------------------------------------------

And TWITTER and the FBI lied about working together as a part of the 
SHADOW GOVERNMENT to limit free speech.

They became the *Ministry of TRUTH* that was run by the *SHADOW* 
*GOVERNMENT* .

For those out there that said *the SHADOW GOVERNMENT is tinfoil hat* 
*territory*  ...you better stock up on tinfoil.