Re: The Unmasking of not a doctor Andrew B.Chung, Ethics Villain

Loose Cannon wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2026 09:16:18 -0700, Michael Ejercito
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> https://ethicsalarms.com/2026/07/29/the-unmasking-of-dr-anthony-fauci-ethics-villain/
>>
>> The Unmasking of not a doctor Andrew B. Chung, Ethics Villain
>> July 29, 2026 / Jack Marshall
>>
>> It was suggested that I lead this post off with this now well-circulated
>> meme…
> 
> The Georgia Composite Medical Board took action against Dr. Andrew
> Ben-Hua Chung's medical license due to long-standing concerns about
> his mental fitness and ability to practice safely, which culminated in
> his failure to comply with mandatory evaluation orders.The primary
> factors leading to his multi-year disciplinary battle and eventual
> final board decisions include:
> 
> 1. Refusal to Comply with Medical Evaluations
> 
> Dr. Chung's license was initially suspended after he failed to comply
> with a board order requiring him to complete a comprehensive mental
> and physical examination. The board explicitly warned that a failure
> to submit the psychiatric evaluation results within a set timeframe
> would trigger a license revocation.
> 
> 2. Erratic Behavior and "Wonderfully Hungry" Mandate
> 
> The board launched an investigation after receiving complaints from
> local attorneys regarding erratic behavior that raised severe patient
> care concerns. Investigative findings and public hearing testimonies
> revealed that Dr. Chung refused to converse or interact with patients,
> board members, or witnesses unless they explicitly stated they were
> "wonderfully hungry".
> 
> 3. Controversial Dietary Teachings
> 
> The board's scrutiny was intensified by Dr. Chung's public promotion
> of his "Be Hungry" diet book, which instructed individuals to strictly
> limit their intake to 32 ounces of food per day. His unorthodox
> practices and social media presence further drew negative attention
> due to a tenuous connection to a high-profile 2012 starvation case
> involving a teenager, though criminal culpability was limited to the
> child's mother.
> 
> 4. Failure to Reverse Board Suspensions
> 
> Dr. Chung repeatedly contested the state's actions through
> administrative agency reviews and hearings. However, because his
> behavior persisted during live hearings and he failed to successfully
> fulfill the board's standard medical prerequisites for safe practice,
> the state consistently upheld its restrictions—ultimately solidifying
> his disciplinary status in the March 2025 Final Decision
> 
    Dr. Chung just keeps humiliating you.

    No wonder you keep posting fanfic instead of addressing Jack 
Marshall's article!


  Michael