Re: ? ?Why are the Christians always trying to impose their politics on others?? ?
William Stickers <[email protected]> Wed, 30 Oct 2024 22:48:55 -0000
| Newsgroups | alt.checkmate,alt.slack.goathead,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.binaries.unoffical.global.chat |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
% wrote: > > William Stickers wrote: > > % wrote: > >> > >> William Stickers wrote: > >>> % wrote: > >>>> > >>>> William Stickers wrote: > >>>>> K Wills wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 22:09:29 -0000, William Stickers > >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> K Wills wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 21:05:31 -0000, William Stickers > >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> K Wills wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 15:00:18 -0000, William Stickers > >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> K Wills wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> [...] > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> She hates most everyone. When people respond negatively to the > >>>>>>>>>>>> hate, it justifies the hate she expresses. It's not her initial hate, > >>>>>>>>>>>> but everyone being trans-phobic (Why else would anyone react > >>>>>>>>>>>> negatively to her hate?). > >>>>>>>>>>>> And it really upsets her that I use her preferred pronouns. She > >>>>>>>>>>>> can't whine and cry about the matter. Since I don't really care if she > >>>>>>>>>>>> lives life as a woman, she can't fall back on her trans-phobic > >>>>>>>>>>>> justification. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Cock, balls and xy chromosomes. He is a man, doofus. Humouring him doesn't > >>>>>>>>>>> change that. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I don't care. You seem to have difficulty understanding this. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I understand you're using female pronouns on a man. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> And? Again, I don't care that Jen wants to live life as a woman. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Yep, I get that. You love trannies and that's why you chase him around like a > >>>>>>> love sick puppy. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Your use of projection isn't working for you. > >>>>> > >>>>> Go see how many times I've replied to him. > >>>>> > >>>>>>>> Sadly, you are, being honest, too stupid to understand. If you > >>>>>>>> don't "run away" from this, you will continue to prove you lack the > >>>>>>>> intellect to ever understand. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Is this a feeble attempt to manipulate me, Kent? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I'm still not Kent. A pity my real, legal name was doxxed some > >>>>>> time ago, huh? > >>>>> > >>>>> Here's you saying that you are Kent. > >>>>> <https://ibb.co/HXNmDHz> > >>>>> This is about the third time I've poasted this and you still deny it. > >>>>> It makes you look very stupid and a liar as well. > >>>>> > >>>>>> Since you've admitted to following me closely for so many years, > >>>>>> why are you unwilling to admit this truth? I really do want to know. I > >>>>>> have a guess, but I want you to state the reason. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'll do what I want when I want and you can stick your pathetic attempt at > >>>>>>> coercion up your flabby arse. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Think about my arse a lot, do you? > >>>>> > >>>>> Only when I want something to kick. > >>>>> > >>>>>> What do you hope to gain by lying about coercion? I would like to > >>>>>> know. But I don't expect you to answer. Not honestly. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Sadly, I've dumbed it down as much as I am able. That it's still too > >>>>>>>>>> cerebral for you is unfortunate. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> He's a man. You are calling him a she. Your dumbing down has succeeded because > >>>>>>>>> that is very dumb. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> You keep proving I can't dumb it down to your level. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Try a different tack, like not 'dumbing down'. Do you think you can manage > >>>>>>> that? Let me see if there is an intelligent Kent, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Outside of your below average intellect, I'm still not Kent. But > >>>>>> you know this. Unless you lied about the devotion you've given me for > >>>>>> over a decade. > >>>>> > >>>>> I've known you a lot longer than that, but it's only fairly recently I've been > >>>>> replying to your poasts here. Before that it was it alt.binaries.chatter and in > >>>>> alt.binaries.unoffical.global.chat. I'd have carried on ignoring you if I > >>>>> didn't find you so irritating, you know, like a fly that keeps buzzing around > >>>>> and pissing you off. > >>>>> > >>>>>>> rather than one who pretends > >>>>>>> he is dumbing down. Easier to say you're dumbing down than show any sign of > >>>>>>> intelligence, isn't it? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> As of the time I write this, you've not said such. But you have > >>>>>> failed to show any sign of intelligence. > >>>>> > >>>>> There you go again. You're like a restaurant with a very limited menu. > >>>>> 1. "stump stupid" or you're "dumbing down". > >>>>> 2. "if you don't run away first you'll do this". > >>>>> 3. issue a demand along with "I really want to know" > >>>>> 4. "I know you'll continue to do..." > >>>>> And that's about all you have. Over and over and again. > >>>>> > >>>>>>> I'd say that someone who denies who he is and then gets > >>>>>>> proved that he is who he claims he isn't, isn't very bright at all. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You are unable to resist claiming I am someone you know I am not. > >>>>> > >>>>> You are Kent Wills. Lie as much as you like. No one believes you. > >>>>> <https://ibb.co/HXNmDHz> > >>>>> > >>>>>> You're the one with the low intellect. A truth you are unable to > >>>>>> resist proving. I am confident you will continue. > >>>>> > >>>>> Menu items 1 and 4. <yawn>. > >>>>> > >>>>>>> That'd make > >>>>>>> them a pretty stupid liar. I'd also say that a convicted burglars in general > >>>>>>> aren't very clever. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> They aren't. > >>>>> > >>>>> The ones caught burgling garages with a minor are the most stupid. > >>>>> > >>>>>> But what does that have to do with anything? Even if > >>>>>> I were the burglar, what would it have to do with my not caring if > >>>>>> someone wants to live as the gender opposite of the one they were born > >>>>>> as? I admit I cannot see the connection. > >>>>> > >>>>> The connection is stupidity. > >>>>> > >>>>>> Oh wait. You realize you lost and are DESPERATE to divert from > >>>>>> this truth. Keep trying. It's possible you will enjoy success at some > >>>>>> point. > >>>>> > >>>>> I'm just mixing it up a bit. You would if you were not so limited. > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>> What he is is an attention seeking transvestite, and you are > >>>>>>>>> giving it to him big time. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Yea for me! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Is that you confessing you can't stop giving that attention whore shit loads of > >>>>>>> attention? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Sarcasm is also above your intellectual level. > >>>>> > >>>>> Menu item 1. <yawn>. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Does it hurt to be as stupid as you are compelled to prove you > >>>>>> are? I'm very curious. > >>>>> > >>>>> Menu items 1 and 3. <yawn> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Do you fancy him or summit? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I find Jen to be quite ugly. And far too stupid to interest me in > >>>>>>>> anything beyond Usenet fodder. > >>>>>>>> Are you projecting your desires onto me? It certainly looks like > >>>>>>>> it. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'm not humping most of his poasts. You are. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> This LIE of yours was exposed almost a year ago. > >>>>> > >>>>> Show me any poast where I've replied to him? > >>>>> I'll save you the trouble if searching, I don't think I ever have. > >>>>> > >>>>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> > >>>>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> > >>>>> > >>>>> Poasts from you to a group I don't subscribe to which is why I didn't reply, > >>>>> and > >>>>> they prove nothing. > >>>>> So far this month you've poasted to ac 36 times. 13 poasts were direct replies > >>>>> to Robert Wolfe AKA 'Jen', and 9 replies were to others about Robert Wolfe AKA > >>>>> 'Jen'. Obsess much? 'Jen' poasts a lot about Checkie, both as 'Jen' and socking > >>>>> up with remailers. But he's batshit crazy. Are you? > >>>>> > >>>>>> As you will already know, there are more examples of my proving > >>>>>> you lied. And more examples of you running away from the truth each > >>>>>> and every time. What means of avoidance will you use this time? > >>>>> > >>>>> Let's see these examples then. I won't hold my breath waiting because your > >>>>> lying, or very confused. > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> There's an orphaned kitten on youtube that was raised by a dog and now believes > >>>>>>>>>>> it is a dog. It's not a dog, it's a delusional cat. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> And this is relevant how? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> It's a figurative analogy used to illustrate a point. It went whoosh over your > >>>>>>>>> pea-brain. If you're quick, (unlikely), you may catch it. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> So there is nothing relevant. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I knew you'd be too slow to get it. Dumbing down is a great excuse. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> As dumb as you are, I fear what you would need to do to dumb > >>>>>> something down. I'm being serious. > >>>>> > >>>>> Furrfu! Menu item 1. <sigh>. > >>>>> > >>>>>>>> BTW, projecting your limited intellect isn't working for you. But > >>>>>>>> keep trying. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> So says the clever guy that doesn't understand what an analogy is. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You failed to note my intellectual superiority to you. It's OK. > >>>>>> You probably can't recognize it. > >>>>> > >>>>> Menu item 1. > >>>>> I'm glad this reply is over. It's like conversing with parrot. > >>>>> > >>>> i'm glad you found someone on your level > >>> > >>> I'm glad you're glad. I'd hate for you to be not glad while you're stuck at > >>> home, drugged up to the eyeballs with fuck all but usenet. > >>> > >> > >> no , no , don't waste it on me , > >> save it , kwills is coming , > >> he's kicking your ass as it is so , > >> you don't want me in there doing it too > > > > Just so long as you're glad. > > > look out , you got incoming <Splat!> -- K Wills confirming he is Kent Wills. Thanks, Kent. <https://ibb.co/HXNmDHz>