Re: Biden U.S. Fish and Wildlife propose killing half a million of one species to save another
"Scout" <[email protected]> Mon, 8 Jul 2024 14:39:55 -0400
| Newsgroups | alt.birdwatching,alt.society.liberalism,or.politics,sac.politics,talk.politics.guns |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]> wrote in message news:u23o8j9q0rsv28ecocc5ltal14u1ark7cd@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com... > [Default] "Scout" <[email protected]> typed: > >> >> >>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]> wrote >>in message >>news:9o2h8j9r97830dl802f100m16sli9dihad@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com... >>> [Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed: >>> >>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]> wrote >>>>in >>>>news:iugg8j9rju88vesqcfq0kr9cqpm5n7n8nb@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck >>>>ing.dwarf.com: >>>> >>>>> [Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed: >>>>> >>>>>>"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>news:[email protected]: >>>>>> >>>>>>> In news:[email protected], Baxter >>>>>>> <[email protected]> typed: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>> In news:[email protected], Baxter >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> typed: >>>>>>>>>> "Ron R." <[email protected]> wrote in news:v66oa4$2apsv$1 >>>>>>>>>> @news.mixmin.net: >>>>>>>>>>> On 7/4/2024 8:03 AM, Baxter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> "Only The Strong..." <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) is proposing killing >>>>>>>>>>>>> half a million barred owls across Washington, Oregon and >>>>>>>>>>>>> California to save the regionâ?Ts northern spotted owls. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Barred owls are a foreign, invasive species. The NW is NOT >>>>their >>>>>>>>>>>> native environment. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Liberals are a foreign, invasive species. Democracy is not their >>>>>>>>>>> native environment. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The Founding Fathers were all libertarians. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Fixed it for ya. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Liar, there were no such things as libertarians back then.... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sure there were. Back then, they were called liberal, but that word >>>>>>> was perverted during FDR's reign. >>>>>>> >>>>>>That's only in your alternative, bizzaro universe. >>>>> >>>>> Baxter proves he has no idea what a Libertarian is. >>>> >>>>STUPID dingleberry shitstain gun-pervert KKKlaun somehow missed the part >>>>that libertarianism is an amalgam of communism and anarchy and began in >>>>1857 >>> >>> Ignorant Admitted Pedophile Groomer Baxter actually thinks that >>> Libertarianism began in 1857. >>> >>> ROFLMAO!!!! >> >>"Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on the rights of the >>individual, liberty, consent of the governed, political equality, right to >>private property and equality before the law.[1][2] Liberals espouse >>various >>and often mutually warring views depending on their understanding of these >>principles but generally support private property, market economies, >>individual rights (including civil rights and human rights), liberal >>democracy, secularism, rule of law, economic and political freedom, >>freedom >>of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, and freedom of >>religion,[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] constitutional government and privacy >>rights.[10] Liberalism is frequently cited as the dominant ideology of >>modern history.[11][12]:?11?" >> >>"Leaders in the British Glorious Revolution of 1688,[16] the American >>Revolution of 1776, and the French Revolution of 1789 used liberal >>philosophy to justify the armed overthrow of royal sovereignty." >> >>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism#: >> >>To bad the meaning has been perverted in the modern era... which is >>probably >>what Baxter is talking about. You know when it was perverted to mean >>overwhelming government control with little or no concern for the rights, >>if >>any, of the individual. >> >>After all, when do see liberals seeking to expand the rights of people, to >>give them control and allow them to make free choices? >> >>Instead, they seem to feel that rights is a limited sum game and for one >>person to have more rights, means another there for has less, and the >>government needs the most rights of all in order to safe guard what few >>remaining rights people have until the government can assume those rights >>as >>well. >> > > This helps to illustrate how much Baxter knows about politics. ie.. Nothing.