Re: OT - anybody here watching the TV pilot & series "Debris" ?
[email protected] (Dorothy J Heydt)
| Newsgroups | rec.arts.sf.written,alt.books.arthur-clarke |
|---|---|
| Organization | Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In article <[email protected]>, Paul S Person <[email protected]> wrote: >On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 00:38:46 -0500, J. Clarke ><[email protected]> wrote: > >>On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 04:03:10 GMT, [email protected] (Dorothy J >>Heydt) wrote: >> >>>In article <[email protected]>, >>>J. Clarke <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 02:41:14 GMT, [email protected] (Dorothy J >>>>Heydt) wrote: >>>> >>>>>In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>Dimensional Traveler <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>On 3/12/2021 5:24 PM, David Lesher wrote: >>>>>>> a425couple <[email protected]> writes: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 3/11/2021 9:40 AM, David Lesher wrote: >>>>>>>>> Watched the first 2 episodes via the NBC streaming app. >>>>>>>>> I can't say I am enthralled with it. The overblown >>>>>>>>> buddy aspect, the piled-on drama over her family, etc. don't >>>>>>>>> help. I may watch next week's episode...but "may".... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yeah. I understand you. >>>>>>>> I saw the 'pilot', and I've now seen about half >>>>>>>> of the 2nd. "may" is right. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Total ridiculous, they (some authority/supervisor) >>>>>>>> tell him her father is somehow alive, while she is deeply >>>>>>>> grieving him, but not tell her, and not want him to tell >>>>>>>> her..... >>>>>>>> WTF? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "We don't know how to write well, and/or our actors suck >>>>>>> So >>>>>>> Dredge up the old tropes, lay on in thick layers, let dry," >>>>>>> >>>>>>Its more likely to be "We can't write well" AND "Someone different >>>>>>writes each episode without knowing what anyone else is writing until we >>>>>>see it on TV". Not only does the production NOT care about continuity, >>>>>>their methods are actively _hostile_ to continuity. >>>>> >>>>>Oh, dear. Don't they have a showrunner? Don't they have a >>>>>"bible"? >>>> >>>>Probably never got around to it--still arguing over whether to call it >>>>a "Bible" or "Q'uran" or a "Veda" or a "Das Kapital"--I mean we >>>>wouldn't want to offend anybody now would we? >>> >>>"bible" with a lower-case b has been the standard jargon for the >>>background (if any) and continuity in a TV series *at least* >>>since 1966, when Bjo Trimble, Tim Courtney, and I were doing Save >>>Star Trek. >> >>"Master-slave" in the context of electronic control systems has >>probably been around longer. But it is the 21st century and we can't >>be having that non-inclusive behavior. > >Well, /that/ was totally irrelevant. > >But true. > >I think "client/server" is still safe ... I don't know if UNIX programmers talk about a "parent" program spawning a "child" program, and stuff happens and then "the child dies..." -- Dorothy J. Heydt Vallejo, California djheydt at gmail dot com Www.kithrup.com/~djheydt/