Re: OT - anybody here watching the TV pilot & series "Debris" ?

[email protected] (Dorothy J Heydt)
Newsgroups rec.arts.sf.written,alt.books.arthur-clarke
Organization Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd.
Message-ID <[email protected]>
In article <[email protected]>,
Paul S Person  <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 00:38:46 -0500, J. Clarke
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 04:03:10 GMT, [email protected] (Dorothy J
>>Heydt) wrote:
>>
>>>In article <[email protected]>,
>>>J. Clarke  <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 02:41:14 GMT, [email protected] (Dorothy J
>>>>Heydt) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In article <[email protected]>,
>>>>>Dimensional Traveler  <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>On 3/12/2021 5:24 PM, David Lesher wrote:
>>>>>>> a425couple <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 3/11/2021 9:40 AM, David Lesher wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Watched the first 2 episodes via the NBC streaming app.
>>>>>>>>> I can't say I am enthralled with it. The overblown
>>>>>>>>> buddy aspect, the piled-on drama over her family, etc. don't
>>>>>>>>> help. I may watch next week's episode...but "may"....
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yeah.  I understand you.
>>>>>>>> I saw the 'pilot', and I've now seen about half
>>>>>>>> of the 2nd.  "may" is right.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Total ridiculous,  they (some authority/supervisor)
>>>>>>>> tell him her father is somehow alive, while she is deeply
>>>>>>>> grieving him, but not tell her, and not want him to tell
>>>>>>>> her.....
>>>>>>>> WTF?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> "We don't know how to write well, and/or our actors suck
>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>> Dredge up the old tropes, lay on in thick layers, let dry,"
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>Its more likely to be "We can't write well" AND "Someone different 
>>>>>>writes each episode without knowing what anyone else is writing until we 
>>>>>>see it on TV".  Not only does the production NOT care about continuity, 
>>>>>>their methods are actively _hostile_ to continuity.
>>>>>
>>>>>Oh, dear.  Don't they have a showrunner?  Don't they have a
>>>>>"bible"?
>>>>
>>>>Probably never got around to it--still arguing over whether to call it
>>>>a "Bible" or "Q'uran" or a "Veda" or a "Das Kapital"--I mean we
>>>>wouldn't want to offend anybody now would we?
>>>
>>>"bible" with a lower-case b has been the standard jargon for the
>>>background (if any) and continuity in a TV series *at least*
>>>since 1966, when Bjo Trimble, Tim Courtney, and I were doing Save
>>>Star Trek.
>>
>>"Master-slave" in the context of electronic control systems has
>>probably been around longer.  But it is the 21st century and we can't
>>be having that non-inclusive behavior.
>
>Well, /that/ was totally irrelevant.
>
>But true.
>
>I think "client/server" is still safe ...

I don't know if UNIX programmers talk about a "parent" program
spawning a "child" program, and stuff happens and then "the child
dies..."

-- 
Dorothy J. Heydt
Vallejo, California
djheydt at gmail dot com
Www.kithrup.com/~djheydt/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.