Re: The James Webb Space Telescope will be 100 times as powerful as the Hubble.
"98.6%" <[email protected]> Thu, 4 Nov 2021 07:33:55 -0400
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy,alt.books.arthur-clarke |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 9/25/2021 1:34 PM, a425couple wrote: > from > https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/22664709/james-webb-space-telescope-launch-date-december-science-hubble > > > > The largest space telescope in history is about to blow our minds > > The James Webb Space Telescope will be 100 times as powerful as the > Hubble. It will change how we see the universe. > Can't wait, I'll be on pins and needles during launch and deployment until the first images. > By Brian Resnick@[email protected] Sep 22, 2021, 9:30am EDT > > Exploring strange new worlds. Understanding the origins of the universe. > Searching for life in the galaxy. These are not the plot of a new > science fiction movie, but the mission objectives of the James Webb > Space Telescope, the long-awaited successor to the Hubble Space > Telescope. NASA is building and launching the Webb in partnership with > the European Space Agency and Canada. > > The launch, which will propel the Webb to nearly a million miles away, > is now scheduled for December 18, 2021. When it fully deploys in space, > the Webb will usher in a new age of astronomy, scientists say, and show > humanity things it has never seen before. > > “The Webb represents the culmination of decades, if not centuries, of > astronomy,” says Sara Seager, a planetary scientist and astrophysicist > at MIT. “We’ve been waiting for this a very long time.” > > Scientists started thinking about a follow-up even before the Hubble > Space Telescope launched in 1990. After more than three decades in > space, it’s unclear how much longer this boundary-breaking satellite > will be able to scan and photograph the universe. > > > The Webb was originally supposed to launch in 2010 and cost around $1 > billion. Its price tag has since ballooned to $10 billion, and it’s way > overdue. But the wait will be worth it, at least according to the > scientists who expect new and revealing glimpses of our universe. > > “We’re going right up to the edge of the observable universe with Webb,” > says Caitlin Casey, an assistant professor of astronomy at the > University of Texas at Austin. “And yeah, we’re excited to see what’s > there.” > > The Webb will surpass the Hubble in several ways. It will allow > astronomers to look not only farther out in space but also further back > in time: It will search for the first stars and galaxies of the > universe. It will allow scientists to make careful studies of numerous > exoplanets — planets that orbit stars other than our sun — and even > embark on a search for signs of life there. > > The Webb is a machine for answering unanswered questions about the > universe, for exploring what has been unexplorable until now. Here’s a > guide to what the Webb is capable of. > > The Webb’s golden mirror is a giant leap for telescopes of its kind > > These are two Hubble images of the Pillars of Creation. The right shows > what it looks like in infrared, which is closer to what the Webb > telescope will see. NASA, ESA, the Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA), A. > Nota (ESA/STScI), and the Westerlund 2 Science Team > > The launch of the Hubble Space Telescope, named after famed astronomer > Edwin Hubble, was itself a huge leap forward for astronomy. Here on > Earth, astronomers seek out remote mountaintops and deserts to build > major telescopes for the best chance of viewing a dark sky away from > pollution and bright lights. But their view is still marred by the > slight haze and luminescence of the Earth’s atmosphere. Space is “the > ultimate mountaintop,” as NASA explains. There’s no better view of space > than the one from, well, space. > > Hubble has meant so much during its 30-year run. For one thing, it’s > sent us unforgettable, jaw-droppingly beautiful images like those of the > Lagoon Nebula and the Pillars of Creation. > > The Hubble Space telescope captures the Lagoon Nebula in 2018. NASA, > ESA, and STScI > > It’s also taught us about the age of the universe, about what happens > when stars explode, about black holes. It helped establish many of the > boundaries that the Webb hopes to push. Most powerfully, its > observations have led scientists to believe the universe is expanding at > an accelerating rate, propelled by something so mysterious that > scientists simply call it “dark energy.” > > The Webb, named for the man who led NASA in the decade leading up to the > moon landing, is set to take all this a step further. “What we’re going > to get is a telescope that’s about 100 times more powerful than Hubble,” > says Amber Straughn, an astrophysicist at NASA who works on the Webb. > > Webb Telescope and Hubble Telescope primary mirror comparison with > person as reference. Michael McClare/Aaron E. Lepsch/Krystofer Kim via > NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center > How? > > The Webb improves on Hubble in two key ways. The first is just its size: > Hubble was about the size of a school bus, whereas Webb is more like the > size of a tennis court. “This thing is enormous,” Straughn says. “Webb > is by far the biggest telescope NASA’s ever attempted to send into space.” > > But it’s not just the total size of the contraption that matters. When > it comes to reflecting telescopes, the key component is the size of its > curved mirror. “You could sort of think of a telescope mirror like a > light bucket,” Straughn says. The more light you can collect in this > bucket, the fainter and farther-away things you can see in the universe. > > > Hubble’s mirror was an impressive 7.8 feet in diameter. Webb’s > beautiful, gold-hued mirrors combine for a diameter of 21.3 feet. > Overall, that amounts to more than six times the light-collecting area. > > A drawing of the Hubble mirror beside the Webb mirror, with a person for > reference. The Hubble mirror is smaller. > NASA > What does that mean in practice? Well, consider one of Hubble’s most > famous images, the Deep Field. In 1995, scientists set the Hubble to > stare off into a teeny-tiny patch of sky (about the size of the head of > a pinhead, held at arm's length from the viewer) and capture as much > light as it could from that one spot. > > The image that came back was astounding. Hubble uncovered thousands of > galaxies in this teensy patch of sky, helping us refine the number of > galaxies thought to exist in the universe. > > > The Hubble Deep Field image shows that even in a tiny patch of sky, > there are thousands of galaxies. NASA, ESA, R. Bouwens, and G. Illingworth > This photograph also revealed Hubble’s larger power — as a time machine. > In astronomy, the farther away things are, the older they are (because > light from faraway places takes a very long time to travel to Earth). > That means this Hubble Deep Field is not only a snapshot of space: It > also contains the history of our universe. Galaxies in this image appear > to us as they were billions of years ago. > > “What Webb will do is take that field and go even further,” UT Austin’s > Casey explains. “So the tiny specks of light in the background of the > Hubble Deep Field will brighten and become more detailed, we’ll be able > to see spiral arms, we’ll be able to see structure, and then we’ll get > more specks of light even further in the past. We’re seeing farther back > in time with Webb.” > > > With Webb, astronomers like Casey will be able to see so far back that > they’ll potentially spot the very first stars and galaxies. Hubble has > seen light dating to about 400 million years after the Big Bang, which > took about 13.3 billion years to reach us. > > “That’s far! But Webb has the capability to take us to 250 million years > after the Big Bang,” explains Casey, who has been approved to work with > the Webb Space Telescope. “It might not sound like a big difference. > What’s a few hundred million years between friends? Actually, it’s the > difference between seeing the first stars that ever turned on [and] > arriving a bit too late after the funeral.” > > The world needs more wonder > The Unexplainable newsletter guides you through the most fascinating, > unanswered questions in science — and the mind-bending ways scientists > are trying to answer them. Sign up today. > > Beyond that are barriers through which even the Webb cannot see. Prior > to the first starlight, the universe was shrouded by a “dense, obscuring > fog of primordial gas,” as the National Science Foundation explains. > There’s no light that reaches our telescopes from this time, which is > called the cosmic dark ages. > > (There is some background radiation from the Big Bang called the cosmic > microwave background, a faint glow that shines to us from before the > dark ages. But for the most part, the dark ages is a blank spot in our > timeline of the universe.) > > Casey and other astronomers hope the Webb will help them understand the > end of the dark ages and figure out what caused this fog to lift. > Scientists suspect the starlight from the earliest galaxies did it. > > “If you have a cloud of gas and it encounters energetic light, that > energetic light will ionize that gas and disassociate that cloud,” Casey > says. “And so if that light just has turned on, it then hits that gas > and really transforms the entire universe from a dark place to a light > place.” > > The Webb telescope sees infrared light — which can be very, very old > > The James Webb Space Telescope under construction in 2016. NASA/Chris Gunn > The Webb’s other advantage is the type of light it collects. > > Light comes in a lot of different varieties. The human eye can see only > a narrow band known as visible light, but the universe contains lots and > lots of light outside this range, including the higher-frequency, > higher-energy forms: ultraviolet, gamma rays. Then there’s the > lower-energy light with longer wavelengths: infrared, microwaves, radio. > > > Hubble could observe a little bit of infrared light, but Webb takes it > much further. NASA and J. Olmstead (STScI) > The Hubble Space Telescope collects visible light, ultraviolet, and a > little bit of infrared. The Webb is primarily an infrared telescope, so > it sees light that’s in a longer wavelength than what our eyes can see. > This seems nerdy and technical, but it’s actually what allows Webb to > look further back in time than the Hubble. > > Infrared light is often very old light, due to a phenomenon call > redshifting. When a light source is moving away from a viewer, it gets > stretched out, morphing into a longer and longer wavelength, growing > redder. (The opposite is true as well: As a light source grows closer, > the wavelengths shorten, growing bluer.) It’s similar to what happens > when a siren goes by: The pitch increases as the siren approaches, then > decreases as it trails away. > > > Because space is constantly expanding, the farthest things away from us > in the universe are moving away from us. “And as light travels through > space from those distant galaxies, the light is literally stretched by > the expansion of space,” Straughn says. > > > As the universe expands, it stretches the wavelengths of light along > with it, a process called redshift. The farther away an object is, the > more the light from it has stretched by the time it reaches us. > NASA/JPL-Caltech/R. Hurt (Caltech-IPAC) > Imagine a star that’s really far away. The light from that star may > start off in the visible spectrum, but it gets stretched on its journey > to us. It grows redder and redder. “So when we see distant galaxies with > Hubble, they’re sort of these little, tiny red nuggets,” Straughn says. > Eventually, these very distant, old galaxies grow so red that they drop > into the infrared spectrum. Webb can see this ancient light that has > become invisible to the human eye. > > Conveniently, infrared light has other uses as well. It’s a really good > type of light to use to look at exoplanets. For instance, if you were on > a planet that orbits another star and wanted to see Earth, visible light > wouldn’t be your best bet. > > “The Earth peaks in the infrared,” says Johns Hopkins Applied Physics > Laboratory astronomer Kevin Stevenson, who plans to use the Webb in his > research. So if we want to be able to study an Earth-like planet in > another solar system, “What we really want to do is observe at infrared > wavelengths, because that’s where the light from the Earth is being > emitted.” > > > Exoplanet scientists like Stevenson are going to use the Webb to analyze > the atmospheres of these worlds: The Webb is capable of determining some > of the chemicals in their atmospheres. “We can detect water, CO, CO2, > methane,” Stevenson says. While those aren’t definitive signs of life on > their own, they could begin to ask fascinating questions: What created > that methane and carbon dioxide? Could it have been life? > > “We all want to find another Earth, don’t we?” Stevenson says. “The > prospect of answering the question ‘are we alone?’ has been something > that we’ve been asking ourselves for centuries. And I think with James > Webb, this will provide us the first opportunity to really answer that > question.” > > This $10 billion gadget better not break > Scientists are clearly raring to go, but the Webb revolution has taken a > while. One reason for all the launch delays to the launch has to do with > contractor snafus. But a big source of all of them, NASA’s Straughn > says, is the complexity of the Webb itself. > > “Because it’s so big, there aren’t any rockets that are big enough to > launch it fully deployed,” Straughn says. The telescope has to be folded > up to fit inside a rocket, and has to deploy itself in space. “So that > whole process of building a deployable telescope in space is the source > of a lot of the engineering challenges.” > > Upping the stakes is the fact that while Hubble was launched to around > 340 miles above the Earth, Webb will be almost a million miles away — > four times the distance from the Earth to the moon. > > That means once the Webb is launched, it will be unserviceable by human > hands if it breaks. That’s scary, considering the history of the Hubble. > Shortly after the Hubble launched in 1990, engineers realized there was > a problem with its mirror; the telescope’s initial images came back > fuzzy, and astronauts had to launch a space shuttle to fix it. That > won’t be possible with the Webb. It just has to work. > > It will be far away for good reason. Because Webb is an infrared > telescope, it needs to be kept cold. The Earth itself is warm and glows > in infrared. “Anything warm glows in infrared light,” Straughn says. “If > the telescope was warm, it would just glow and see itself.” > > > James Webb Space Telescope orbit as seen from above the Sun’s north pole > and as seen from Earth’s perspective. Michael McClare/Aaron E. > Lepsch/Josh Masters via NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center > Remarkably, any scientist around the world can apply to use the Webb > Space Telescope, provided they write up a project proposal that passes > peer review. It’s pretty competitive. Last year the Space Telescope > Science Institute, which operates space telescopes from John Hopkins > University in Maryland, put out a call for proposals for Webb’s first > observing run. About a quarter of the proposals were accepted. > > “It feels like part of me is still stunned,” says Lisa Dang, a physics > PhD student at McGill University who was one of the lucky few to get > approved to use the Webb. “And the other part is having this imposter > syndrome — like, these data better be really amazing.” > > Dang is set to study one of the most extreme planets ever discovered: > K2-141 b, a planet 202 light-years from Earth and so close to its host > star that its surface is believed to be covered by an ocean of lava. If > it has clouds, they are likely made out of vaporized rock, which could > then precipitate out “rock rain.” Not much is confirmed about this lava > planet, but Dang will use the Webb to study its atmosphere and see > what’s possible on this extreme world. > > Winning the project proposal “made me feel like an astronomer for the > first time,” Dang says. “But it also makes K2-141 b very real suddenly.” > > This is the power of an unprecedented telescope such as the Webb. It > will help astronomers like Dang fill in the blank spaces of the cosmos. > > “It’s wild, when you think about it, that we’re able to piece together > the history of what happened before the Earth or the sun even existed,” > Casey says. > > If all goes according to plan, these kinds of breakthroughs could come > in a matter of months. Astronomers around the world are waiting for the > countdown to begin. > > > We have a request > > In moments like this — as people grapple to understand variants and > vaccines, and kids head back to school — many outlets take their > paywalls down. Vox’s content is always free, in part because of > financial support from our readers. We’ve been covering the Covid-19 > pandemic for more than a year and a half. From the beginning, our goal > was to bring clarity to chaos. To empower people with the information > they needed to stay safe. And we’re not stopping. > > To our delight, you, our readers, helped us hit our goal of adding 2,500 > financial contributions in September in just 9 days. So we’re setting a > new goal: to add 4,500 contributions by the end of the month. Reader > support helps keep our coverage free, and is a critical part of > sustaining our resource-intensive work. Will you help us reach our goal > by making a contribution to Vox with as little as $3? > > FEATURED VIDEOS FROM VOX