Re: Superhabitable planets - Bigger, better, more suited for biology
Whisper <[email protected]> Sun, 6 Mar 2022 00:16:18 +1100
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy,alt.books.arthur-clarke |
|---|---|
| Organization | Ausics - https://www.ausics.net |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 6/03/2022 12:03 am, R Kym Horsell wrote: > In alt.astronomy Daniel65 <[email protected]> wrote: >> [email protected] wrote on 5/3/22 5:45 am: >>> OK, but don't forget : >>> Distance = Speed x Time >>> Interstellar distances are so very great, as to preclude any chance of >>> travel, or practical communications. >> Could someone please change the record?? This one is broken!! > > The same refrain we've seen for 30y on the climate groups. > ".003% of the atm cain chang nuttin!" > "you cain walk aroun da worl you need to use an airplane". > "you'll nebba replas da hors n buggy" > All completely different. Humans can't survive long term off the earth. We would be defeated by the effects of gravity/radiation and many other challenges etc. Even if we could design transportation to get to an extra solar planet (100% impossible imo) we'd die before we got to 0.0001% of the journey. Journeys to extra solar planets and contacting aliens are *never* going to happen so let's frame the discussions here within realistic boundaries. This isn't a sci-fi group.