Re: Superhabitable planets - Bigger, better, more suited for biology

Whisper wrote on 6/3/22 12:16 am:
> On 6/03/2022 12:03 am, R Kym Horsell wrote:
>> In alt.astronomy Daniel65 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> [email protected] wrote on 5/3/22 5:45 am:
>>>> OK, but don't forget :
>>>> Distance = Speed x Time
>>>> Interstellar distances are so very great, as to preclude any chance of
>>>> travel, or practical communications.
>>> Could someone please change the record?? This one is broken!!
>>
>> The same refrain we've seen for 30y on the climate groups.
>> ".003% of the atm cain chang nuttin!"
>> "you cain walk aroun da worl you need to use an airplane".
>> "you'll nebba replas da hors n buggy"
>>
> 
> 
> All completely different.  Humans can't survive long term off the earth. 
>   We would be defeated by the effects of gravity/radiation and many 
> other challenges etc.  Even if we could design transportation to get to 
> an extra solar planet (100% impossible imo) we'd die before we got to 
> 0.0001% of the journey.

AH!!! There's the important FACT ... 'imo'!!
> 
> Journeys to extra solar planets and contacting aliens are *never* going 
> to happen so let's frame the discussions here within realistic 
> boundaries.  This isn't a sci-fi group.

Hmm!! What's alt.books.arthur-clarke about if not sci-fi books?? Just 
his science books ONLY, maybe!!
-- 
Daniel