Re: "The Third Man" wins the Grand Prix at Cannes (17/9/1949)
HenHanna <[email protected]> Wed, 18 Sep 2024 01:06:35 -0700
| Newsgroups | sci.lang,alt.usage.english,rec.arts.anime.misc,alt.books.james-joyce |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 9/17/2024 4:09 AM, Ross Clark wrote:
> Story by Graham Greene, directed by Carol Reed, with Orson Welles in a
> central role. Noirish occupied Vienna in 1946.
>
> I certainly remember Anton Karas's theme tune on the zither; it was on
> the radio a lot when the film was new. But I was a small boy, and this
> was not a suitable film. I didn't see it until maybe a decade later.
>
> And the language angle? The envelope, please...
>
> Crystal references a paper he gave at a conference a few years ago:
> "Going Especially Careful: Language Reference in Graham Greene".
> To my surprise, it's right here:
>
> https://www.davidcrystal.com/Files/BooksAndArticles/-4838.pdf
>
> But just to summarize the points for today:
>
> Greene never said much explicitly about language.
> But his characters notice it and talk about it all the time.
> And "whenever there's explicit reference -- to accent, words, grammar --
> or to individual languages and dialects, it's a sign that trouble is
> brewing.
> [I want to jump up and say, "But trouble is brewing all the time in
> Graham Greene's novels, so the correlation is not significant." But I
> won't.]
>
> Anyhow: language-related plot elements in The Third Man:
>
> - The point-of-view/narrator character (played by Joseph Cotton) is a
> novelist.
> - He has come to Vienna to write advertising/propaganda for his old
> friend Harry Lime (Welles).
> - He can't speak German, so has to rely on interpreters a lot, and gets
> into difficulties when he hasn't got one.
> - The people he meets have strange names, which he often gets wrong.
> - He ends up having to give a lecture on a subject he knows nothing
> about, and is lost for words. In answer to a question he says "Well,
> yes, I suppose that is what I meant to say."
>
> There's more at the link above.
>
> Just in case you don't know this film, the most famous quote from it is
> Harry's "cuckoo clock" speech before he disappears, which has nothing to
> do with language:
>
> (as rendered on IMDb)
>
> Harry Lime: Don't be so gloomy. After all, it's not that awful. Like the
> fella says, in Italy for 30 years under the Borgias they had warfare,
> terror, murder, and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo
> da Vinci, and the Renaissance. In Switzerland they had brotherly love -
> they had 500 years of democracy and peace, and what did that produce?
> The cuckoo clock. So long, Holly.
> - He ends up having to give a lecture on a subject he knows nothing
> about, and is lost for words.
this used to be a common setup in Old(er) movies ... There's a
fav. Hitchcock movie containing a scene like that.
_______________
i don't think of [The Third Man] as particularly Ling-intensive.
[A Clockwork Orange] or [To Build a Fire] (both with Burgess)
or [My Fair Lady]
are much more Ling-intensive.