Re: Is this really necessary
James Kuyper <[email protected]> Sun, 15 Aug 2021 00:39:28 -0400
| Newsgroups | alt.books.pratchett |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/14/21 4:33 PM, Juha Nieminen wrote: > Keith Thompson <[email protected]> wrote: >> In the C++11 standard, the section is: >> >> 17.5.1.5 [structure.see.also] >> >> Paragraphs labeled ?See also:? contain cross-references to >> the relevant portions of this International Standard and the ISO >> C standard, which is incorporated into this International Standard >> by reference. > > I understand that to mean "the referenced parts should be considered > part of this standard as well". In other words, *only* the referenced > parts. > > I could be wrong, of course. As Tim pointed out, that interpretation is inconsistent with the use of the singular verb - "referenced parts" is plural. There's a simple, obvious singular thing that is the corresponding subject, and that's "the ISO C standard". As Keith pointed out, while this is linguistically correct, it's probably not the intent. Virtually the entirety of section 6 of the C standard is duplicated in the C++ standard, with modifications that in many places make it incompatible with the the wording in the C standard, making it questionable what it would mean for section 6 to be incorporated by reference. The changed wording in C++2017 is almost certainly what was intended all along.