Re: Hallucinated citations are polluting the scientific literature. What can be done?

The True Melissa <[email protected]>
Newsgroups sci.edu,comp.ai.philosophy,alt.books,alt.politics.media,rec.arts.books,misc.writing
Organization n/a
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Verily, in article <[email protected]>, did [email protected] 
deliver unto us this message:
> I usually tell people the following about LLMs:
> 
> Ask it questions about a subject you know well.  See how long it takes
> it to tell you sonething inaccurate.  Ask yourself if you'd have caught
> the mistake if you didn't have the knowledge you do.  Finally, ask
> yourself: do you still trust the LLM?
> 

It's a handy exercise, but I'm not sure how much it would help. 
Confidence is such a useful trick to sucker humans. I once saw a study 
which said that we weigh confidence more heavily than a person's actual 
track record when deciding whether to believe. 

It works just as well on other humans. I recently read a book which 
included a survey of an impact on the various arts, and when I got to 
the music section, I realized the writer wasn't very well informed. For 
no rational reason, the sections about which I knew less still felt 
convincing. 

-- 
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.