Re: Hallucinated citations are polluting the scientific literature. What can be done?

jojo <[email protected]>
Newsgroups sci.edu,comp.ai.philosophy,alt.books,alt.politics.media,rec.arts.books,misc.writing,alt.slack
Organization jieigyou
Message-ID <[email protected]>
phoenix wrote:
> The True Melissa wrote:
>> Verily, in article <[email protected]>, did 
>> [email protected]
>> deliver unto us this message:
>>> I usually tell people the following about LLMs:
>>>
>>> Ask it questions about a subject you know well.  See how long 
>>> it takes
>>> it to tell you sonething inaccurate.  Ask yourself if you'd 
>>> have caught
>>> the mistake if you didn't have the knowledge you do.  Finally, 
>>> ask
>>> yourself: do you still trust the LLM?
>>>
>>
>> It's a handy exercise, but I'm not sure how much it would help.
>> Confidence is such a useful trick to sucker humans. I once saw 
>> a study
>> which said that we weigh confidence more heavily than a 
>> person's actual
>> track record when deciding whether to believe.
> 
> They are definitely in the business of the confidence game. One 
> of the AIs had me nearly convinced it was looking at me through 
> the webcam, as we communicated. However, another AI informed me 
> that the trickster had been hallucinating to deceive.
> 

dumb people will succomb to their dumbness with ai. at this point 
in time, ai is an enabler and not exactly a supporter.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.