Re: Hallucinated citations are polluting the scientific literature. What can be done?
jojo <[email protected]> Tue, 19 May 2026 13:24:10 +0000
| Newsgroups | sci.edu,comp.ai.philosophy,alt.books,alt.politics.media,rec.arts.books,misc.writing,alt.slack |
|---|---|
| Organization | jieigyou |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
phoenix wrote: > The True Melissa wrote: >> Verily, in article <[email protected]>, did >> [email protected] >> deliver unto us this message: >>> I usually tell people the following about LLMs: >>> >>> Ask it questions about a subject you know well. See how long >>> it takes >>> it to tell you sonething inaccurate. Ask yourself if you'd >>> have caught >>> the mistake if you didn't have the knowledge you do. Finally, >>> ask >>> yourself: do you still trust the LLM? >>> >> >> It's a handy exercise, but I'm not sure how much it would help. >> Confidence is such a useful trick to sucker humans. I once saw >> a study >> which said that we weigh confidence more heavily than a >> person's actual >> track record when deciding whether to believe. > > They are definitely in the business of the confidence game. One > of the AIs had me nearly convinced it was looking at me through > the webcam, as we communicated. However, another AI informed me > that the trickster had been hallucinating to deceive. > dumb people will succomb to their dumbness with ai. at this point in time, ai is an enabler and not exactly a supporter.