Re: Hallucinated citations are polluting the scientific literature. What can be done?

Steve Hayes <[email protected]>
Newsgroups sci.edu,comp.ai.philosophy,alt.books,alt.politics.media,rec.arts.books,misc.writing
Organization Khanya Publications
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 19 May 2026 12:11:32 -0400, Jonathan Lamothe
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Steve Hayes <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> On Mon, 18 May 2026 14:54:41 -0400, Jonathan Lamothe
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>John Ames <[email protected]> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 18 May 2026 10:46:11 -0400
>>>> Jonathan Lamothe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I have never seen an actual definition if what AI *is*.
>>>>
>>>> That's because when you say "a program that does auto-complete using a
>>>> large context window as an index to a *very* large reference dataset,
>>>> but it plays dice according to the statistical likelihood of a given
>>>> word-chain in the reference data" it starts to sound kinda silly and
>>>> unreliable.
>>>
>>>I'd say that's more the definition of an LLM.  The term "AI" *vastly*
>>>predates LLMs.
>>
>> And is not really accurate when applied to LLMs. 
>
>What, specifically, would you say is inaccurate about it?

LLMs are not "intelligent"; they do not "understand" the data they are
dealing with, even though their programers sometimes like to give them
the appearance of doing so. 


-- 
Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
Web:  http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
Blog: http://methodius.blogspot.com
E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.