Re: Exciting New Birth Control Method Call ed “Socialism”

On Thu, 30 Jul 2026 10:40:46 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
wrote:

>On 7/29/2026 5:40 PM, dart200 wrote:
>> On 7/29/26 1:33 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>> "The socialist city may promise to care for every child — but 
>>> increasingly, it just doesn’t contain any. A new Wall Street Journal 
>>> analysis finds that, over the past decade, American cities lost 
>>> children six times faster than the country overall. Some cities that 
>>> grew still lost kids, replacing families with trust-fund singles, 
>>> yuppies, and people too poor to leave.
>>>
>>> Meanwhile, the five fastest-growing American cities in 2025? Well, 
>>> they were all exurbs in Texas. To state the obvious revealed 
>>> preference: middle-class moms and dads do not want to raise their kids 
>>> amongst dangerous fentanyl addicts while spending 70% of their income 
>>> on housing, all while sending little Johnny to chaotic public schools 
>>> (with the fent addicts’ dealers’ kids), so they leave. In that void, 
>>> the DSA happily agitates for class warfare, because the actual 
>>> solution (building housing) requires motivated capitalists — whom DSA 
>>> leaders hate more than their dads."
>> 
>> socialism now is when local rich people using zoning regulations in 
>> local govts to block high density housing projects driving up land 
>> prices in a market, causing families to move where vast tracks of land 
>> exist outside of locations where rich people block housing projects...
>
>Government causes problem.
>
>Collectivists blame it on rich people.

Rich people hide in the shadows claiming innocence, while they buy
politicians to do their public actions for them.
-- 
Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
Don't get political with me young man
or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
<<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
dares: Ned
does not dare: Julian  shrinks in horror and warns others away