Re: assuming we don't have a 100x unicorn improvement in battery tech anytime soon ...
Wilson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/30/2026 1:07 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jul 2026 10:34:31 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On 7/28/2026 5:36 PM, dart200 wrote: >>> On 7/28/26 2:10 PM, Wilson wrote: >>>> On 7/28/2026 3:06 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>> >>>>> i still won't trust or support private companies running nuclear >>>>> shipping dud, ur just a negligent retard who willfully ignores how >>>>> that record was produced because ur nothing more than unrepentant >>>>> ideologue >>>> >>>> And you think centralized command and control is a panacea, apparently. >>> >>> that's what produced the record wilson: a strict military hierarchy >>> dealing with life/death decision making, where command comes entirely >>> from within and is strictly audited in performance for actual decades >>> before given major positions of command >>> >>> on what basis do have to show that the private market will be anything >>> of that sort... >>> >>> just more _bear_ assertions, eh? >> >> Ah, so the best possible scenario you can imagine is a world that is >> based on a military structure. >> >> Got it. > > No, the implication is that profit motive does not provide the kind of > minds that society needs. There's this thing called ethics. The free market works best when the participants have a shared and broad ethical system that values (among other things) treating others fairly, the same way most of us want to be treated.