Re: assuming we don't have a 100x unicorn improvement in battery tech anytime soon ...

On Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:16:14 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
wrote:

>On 7/30/2026 1:07 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Jul 2026 10:34:31 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> On 7/28/2026 5:36 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>> On 7/28/26 2:10 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On 7/28/2026 3:06 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i still won't trust or support private companies running nuclear
>>>>>> shipping dud, ur just a negligent retard who willfully ignores how
>>>>>> that record was produced because ur nothing more than unrepentant
>>>>>> ideologue
>>>>>
>>>>> And you think centralized command and control is a panacea, apparently.
>>>>
>>>> that's what produced the record wilson: a strict military hierarchy
>>>> dealing with life/death decision making, where command comes entirely
>>>> from within and is strictly audited in performance for actual decades
>>>> before given major positions of command
>>>>
>>>> on what basis do have to show that the private market will be anything
>>>> of that sort...
>>>>
>>>> just more _bear_ assertions, eh?
>>>
>>> Ah, so the best possible scenario you can imagine is a world that is
>>> based on a military structure.
>>>
>>> Got it.
>> 
>> No, the implication is that profit motive does not provide the kind of
>> minds that society needs.
>
>There's this thing called ethics. The free market works best when the 
>participants have a shared and broad ethical system that values (among 
>other things) treating others fairly, the same way most of us want to be 
>treated.

Cool.  Let me know when the markets get within astronomical units of
that ideal.
-- 
Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
Don't get political with me young man
or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
<<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
dares: Ned
does not dare: Julian  shrinks in horror and warns others away