Re: assuming we don't have a 100x unicorn improvement in battery tech anytime soon ...

On Jul 31, 2026 at 12:16:14 PM EDT, "Wilson" <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 7/30/2026 1:07 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Jul 2026 10:34:31 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> On 7/28/2026 5:36 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>> On 7/28/26 2:10 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On 7/28/2026 3:06 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> i still won't trust or support private companies running nuclear
>>>>>> shipping dud, ur just a negligent retard who willfully ignores how
>>>>>> that record was produced because ur nothing more than unrepentant
>>>>>> ideologue
>>>>> 
>>>>> And you think centralized command and control is a panacea, apparently.
>>>> 
>>>> that's what produced the record wilson: a strict military hierarchy
>>>> dealing with life/death decision making, where command comes entirely
>>>> from within and is strictly audited in performance for actual decades
>>>> before given major positions of command
>>>> 
>>>> on what basis do have to show that the private market will be anything
>>>> of that sort...
>>>> 
>>>> just more _bear_ assertions, eh?
>>> 
>>> Ah, so the best possible scenario you can imagine is a world that is
>>> based on a military structure.
>>> 
>>> Got it.
>> 
>> No, the implication is that profit motive does not provide the kind of
>> minds that society needs.
> 
> There's this thing called ethics. The free market works best when the
> participants have a shared and broad ethical system that values (among
> other things) treating others fairly, the same way most of us want to be

> treated.

Oh right...Ethics.  oh where oh where did they go.

But they didn't disappear. And don't dispair, I see them poking up all over
the place here in my little town.