Re: assuming we don't have a 100x unicorn improvement in battery tech anytime soon ...
dart200 <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/31/26 10:13 AM, Wilson wrote: > On 7/31/2026 12:19 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote: >> On Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:16:14 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On 7/30/2026 1:07 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote: >>>> On Thu, 30 Jul 2026 10:34:31 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> On 7/28/2026 5:36 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>> On 7/28/26 2:10 PM, Wilson wrote: >>>>>>> On 7/28/2026 3:06 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> i still won't trust or support private companies running nuclear >>>>>>>> shipping dud, ur just a negligent retard who willfully ignores how >>>>>>>> that record was produced because ur nothing more than unrepentant >>>>>>>> ideologue >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And you think centralized command and control is a panacea, >>>>>>> apparently. >>>>>> >>>>>> that's what produced the record wilson: a strict military hierarchy >>>>>> dealing with life/death decision making, where command comes entirely >>>>>> from within and is strictly audited in performance for actual decades >>>>>> before given major positions of command >>>>>> >>>>>> on what basis do have to show that the private market will be >>>>>> anything >>>>>> of that sort... >>>>>> >>>>>> just more _bear_ assertions, eh? >>>>> >>>>> Ah, so the best possible scenario you can imagine is a world that is >>>>> based on a military structure. >>>>> >>>>> Got it. >>>> >>>> No, the implication is that profit motive does not provide the kind of >>>> minds that society needs. >>> >>> There's this thing called ethics. The free market works best when the >>> participants have a shared and broad ethical system that values (among >>> other things) treating others fairly, the same way most of us want to be >>> treated. >> >> Cool. Let me know when the markets get within astronomical units of >> that ideal. > > Markets are a function, not a person. Only people can have ethics. > governments are a function, not a person. only people can have ethics and therefore govts can't be immoral. -- hi, i'm nick! let's end war 🙃