Re: assuming we don't have a 100x unicorn improvement in battery tech anytime soon ...

On 7/31/26 12:15 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2026 11:31:23 -0700, dart200
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On 7/31/26 10:14 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>> On 7/31/2026 12:22 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>> On 7/31/26 9:16 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On 7/30/2026 1:07 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 30 Jul 2026 10:34:31 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 7/28/2026 5:36 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 7/28/26 2:10 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 7/28/2026 3:06 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> i still won't trust or support private companies running nuclear
>>>>>>>>>> shipping dud, ur just a negligent retard who willfully ignores how
>>>>>>>>>> that record was produced because ur nothing more than unrepentant
>>>>>>>>>> ideologue
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And you think centralized command and control is a panacea,
>>>>>>>>> apparently.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> that's what produced the record wilson: a strict military hierarchy
>>>>>>>> dealing with life/death decision making, where command comes entirely
>>>>>>>> from within and is strictly audited in performance for actual decades
>>>>>>>> before given major positions of command
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> on what basis do have to show that the private market will be
>>>>>>>> anything
>>>>>>>> of that sort...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> just more _bear_ assertions, eh?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ah, so the best possible scenario you can imagine is a world that is
>>>>>>> based on a military structure.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Got it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, the implication is that profit motive does not provide the kind of
>>>>>> minds that society needs.
>>>>>
>>>>> There's this thing called ethics. The free market works best when the
>>>>> participants have a shared and broad ethical system that values
>>>>> (among other things) treating others fairly, the same way most of us
>>>>> want to be treated.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> coercive border control certainly isn't treating people fairly u twat lol
>>>
>>>
>>> Open borders, which drive down pay for the lowest earners, are certainly
>>> not treating the people who already live there fairly, you mental munchkin.
>>>
>>
>> errr ... so competing in an open labor market is now unfair because it
>> results in the market driving down the price of labor???
>>
>> that's exactly the market working as intended, what exactly is unfair
>> about it???
>>
>> what actual ethical principle has even been violated???
> 
> Wilson's desire to come up with a reason for his acceptance of cruel
> behavior towards immigrants.   Come on, you didn't expect wilson to
> actually admit his real reasons were you?

i expect him to provide an actual ethical principle that has been 
violated, or have me endlessly taunt him about not actually supporting 
free markets

-- 
hi, i'm nick!
let's end war 🙃