Re: assuming we don't have a 100x unicorn improvement in battery tech anytime soon ...

On Jul 31, 2026 at 3:23:18 PM EDT, "dart200"
<[email protected]> wrote:

> On 7/31/26 12:15 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>> On Fri, 31 Jul 2026 11:31:23 -0700, dart200
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 7/31/26 10:14 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 7/31/2026 12:22 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>> On 7/31/26 9:16 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/30/2026 1:07 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 30 Jul 2026 10:34:31 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 7/28/2026 5:36 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 7/28/26 2:10 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 7/28/2026 3:06 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> i still won't trust or support private companies running nuclear
>>>>>>>>>>> shipping dud, ur just a negligent retard who willfully ignores how
>>>>>>>>>>> that record was produced because ur nothing more than unrepentant
>>>>>>>>>>> ideologue
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> And you think centralized command and control is a panacea,
>>>>>>>>>> apparently.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> that's what produced the record wilson: a strict military hierarchy
>>>>>>>>> dealing with life/death decision making, where command comes entirely
>>>>>>>>> from within and is strictly audited in performance for actual decades
>>>>>>>>> before given major positions of command
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> on what basis do have to show that the private market will be
>>>>>>>>> anything
>>>>>>>>> of that sort...
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> just more _bear_ assertions, eh?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Ah, so the best possible scenario you can imagine is a world that is
>>>>>>>> based on a military structure.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Got it.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> No, the implication is that profit motive does not provide the kind of
>>>>>>> minds that society needs.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> There's this thing called ethics. The free market works best when the
>>>>>> participants have a shared and broad ethical system that values
>>>>>> (among other things) treating others fairly, the same way most of us
>>>>>> want to be treated.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> coercive border control certainly isn't treating people fairly u twat lol
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Open borders, which drive down pay for the lowest earners, are certainly
>>>> not treating the people who already live there fairly, you mental munchkin.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> errr ... so competing in an open labor market is now unfair because it
>>> results in the market driving down the price of labor???
>>> 
>>> that's exactly the market working as intended, what exactly is unfair
>>> about it???
>>> 
>>> what actual ethical principle has even been violated???
>> 
>> Wilson's desire to come up with a reason for his acceptance of cruel
>> behavior towards immigrants.   Come on, you didn't expect wilson to
>> actually admit his real reasons were you?
> 
> i expect him to provide an actual ethical principle that has been
> violated, or have me endlessly taunt him about not actually supporting
> free markets

you two need to get a room