Re: How art invented humanity
Noah Sombrero <[email protected]> Fri, 31 Jul 2026 18:54:57 -0400
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy |
|---|---|
| Organization | Noah's Kitchen |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 31 Jul 2026 22:23:00 +0000, Creon <[email protected]> wrote: >At Fri, 31 Jul 2026 17:52:45 -0000 (UTC), Tara <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> In 1940, rumours of secret passageways to an old manor lured four teenage boys >> into a hole in the ground near the village of Montignac in southwestern >> France. Instead of a tunnel laden with gold, they found a series of natural >> chambers bejewelled with exquisite paintings: horses and elk, ibex and bulls, >> almost perfectly preserved on the limestone walls. Experts examining the >> Lascaux caves in subsequent years using radiocarbon dating estimated that the >> paintings had been made some 19,000 years ago. Today, the images are believed >> to be around 20,000 years old. But Lascaux is far from the oldest example of >> human art. Since 1940, many other caves have been found in Europe, Australia, >> Indonesia and Africa containing art no less astounding. Some of it is more >> than twice the age of the Lascaux murals. >> Cave painting of prehistoric animals in earthy tones on a textured rock >> surface. >> >> These discoveries have turned the questions of when and why humans invented >> art into central problems of the human sciences. As fair and poignant as such >> questions may be, they leave unaddressed the deeper mystery of what art is in >> the first place, where it comes from in the human soul, and what it might >> reveal to us about the nature of reality. >> >> Popular legend holds that when Pablo Picasso visited the Lascaux cave a few >> years after its discovery, he emerged exclaiming: ÂWe have invented nothing  >> art had appeared full-grown from its earliest instance. The common >> interpretation is that Picasso was humbly attributing the invention of art to >> our prehistoric ancestors rather than claiming it for himself and his >> contemporaries, or any human of the modern age. But perhaps this apocryphal >> story conveys a weirder truth, namely that no one really invented art. >> Instead, it was the other way around: art invented humanity.......... >> >> Art has never been a celebration of humanity, but always an exploration of >> those borderlands where the human ends and something else begins. This applies >> even to art dealing with seemingly human ideas, feelings and things. Only >> through art can a city become a jungle, a house an alien structure, a sadness >> a kind of weather event.................... >> >> https://aeon.co/essays/humans-did-not-invent-art-it-was-the-other-way-around?utm_source=Aeon+Newsletter&utm_campaign=48f001c5bc-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2026_07_24_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_-49ad69cbc2-71577312 > >Which brings to mind a question I've seen before... > >Which came first: music, or speech? There is a peculiar form of singing among indigenous inuit. I can't think of what they call it now. -- Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain Don't get political with me young man or I'll tie you to a railroad track and <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>> Who dares to talk to El Sombrero? dares: Ned does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away