Re: The unspoken truth about wildfires

On Fri, 31 Jul 2026 19:52:30 -0700, Dude <[email protected]> wrote:

>On 7/31/2026 2:23 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>> On Fri, 31 Jul 2026 16:20:28 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 7/31/2026 2:06 PM, Tara wrote:
>>>> On Jul 31, 2026 at 12:40:32?PM EDT, "Wilson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 7/30/2026 3:50 PM, Tara wrote:
>>>>>> Julian <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 30/07/2026 19:56, Tara wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Jul 30, 2026 at 2:53:09?PM EDT, "Julian" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 30/07/2026 19:29, Tara wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 30, 2026 at 2:04:17?PM EDT, "Julian" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sadly he was proved right. So was I. After I warned in these very pages
>>>>>>>>>>> last year that government policy was worsening the fire risk on
>>>>>>>>>>> moorland, it gives me no pleasure to say: ‘I told you so.’
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Ridley
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Indigenous peoples in North America have been conrolling the threat of wild
>>>>>>>>>> fires with prescribed/controlled burns for centuries. Canada is looking to do
>>>>>>>>>> the same in co-operation with our native people. We have a problem doing this
>>>>>>>>>> however because of the acessibility and vastness of our forests. But in a
>>>>>>>>>> country the size of Britain (and other European countries), it seems to me
>>>>>>>>>> that controlled fires are a no brainer.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Are inaccessible fires in vast forests really a problem?
>>>>>>>>> I think they're as likely good for the land's long term health.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is that, but an uncontrolled fire can massively grow and send a lot of
>>>>>>>> smoke to people populated areas.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A bit like a volcano.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah like that.
>>>>>
>>>>> The northeast US is hundreds of miles from the wildfires yet we've had
>>>>> serious air quality warnings this year and last. A few weeks ago it
>>>>> literally dimmed the sun for several days, making what was otherwise a
>>>>> clear day look cloudy.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.cbsnews.com/news/wildfires-smoke-millions-exposed-midwest-northeast-us/
>>>>>
>>>>> Those pictures are not an exaggeration. That's what it really looked like.
>>>>>
>>>>> Meanwhile the idiot treehuggers think they know what's best.
>>>>
>>>> I am an admitted tree hugger but I am also a realist and think that one answer
>>>> here is controlled burning. Another is education and strictly enforced laws
>>>> against those who are careless and start fires through laziness and ignorance,
>>>> clearing vegetation around and near dwellings and building fire resistent
>>>> homes.
>>>
>>> Yes I agree. The funny thing is, the idiot treehuggers I'm talking about
>>> are killing more trees by not allowing beneficial things like controlled
>>> burns.
>> 
>> Asl if tree huggers had the power to allow or not allow anything.
> >
>It's very difficult for one individual to prevent forest fires when they 
>do nothing and deny they have a problem with fire prevention in Canada.

Same thing for tree choppers.
-- 
Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
Don't get political with me young man
or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
<<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
dares: Ned
does not dare: Julian  shrinks in horror and warns others away