Re: assuming we don't have a 100x unicorn improvement in battery tech anytime soon ...

On 7/31/2026 5:11 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2026 16:14:36 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 7/31/2026 2:31 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>> On 7/31/26 10:14 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 7/31/2026 12:22 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>> On 7/31/26 9:16 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There's this thing called ethics. The free market works best when
>>>>>> the participants have a shared and broad ethical system that values
>>>>>> (among other things) treating others fairly, the same way most of us
>>>>>> want to be treated.
>>>>>
>>>>> coercive border control certainly isn't treating people fairly u twat
>>>>> lol
>>>>
>>>> Open borders, which drive down pay for the lowest earners, are
>>>> certainly not treating the people who already live there fairly, you
>>>> mental munchkin.
>>>
>>> errr ... so competing in an open labor market is now unfair because it
>>> results in the market driving down the price of labor???
>>>
>>> that's exactly the market working as intended, what exactly is unfair
>>> about it???
>>>
>>> what actual ethical principle has even been violated???
>>
>> Not allowing the owners to have a say in how things are run.
> 
> That becomes necessary when owners refuse to be ethical.

What if your ethics don't align with those who decide they get to decide 
what's ethical?