Re: oh, it's called a sweeping generalization retard ...
Noah Sombrero <[email protected]> Sat, 01 Aug 2026 13:08:20 -0400
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy |
|---|---|
| Organization | Noah's Kitchen |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 1 Aug 2026 12:55:02 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: >On 7/31/2026 11:36 PM, dart200 wrote: >> On 7/31/26 5:00 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote: >>> On Fri, 31 Jul 2026 23:39:13 +0000, Creon <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> At Fri, 31 Jul 2026 19:01:36 -0400, Noah Sombrero <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, 31 Jul 2026 15:37:08 -0700, dart200 >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 7/31/26 3:16 PM, Creon wrote: >>>>>>> At Fri, 31 Jul 2026 10:14:40 -0700, Dude <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 7/31/2026 1:53 AM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 7/30/26 9:25 PM, Creon wrote: >>>>>>>>>> At Thu, 30 Jul 2026 20:43:53 -0700, Dude <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 7/30/2026 6:53 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/30/26 6:44 PM, Creon wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> At Thu, 30 Jul 2026 19:42:44 -0400, Noah Sombrero >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 30 Jul 2026 21:47:37 +0000, Creon >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> At Thu, 30 Jul 2026 14:02:12 -0700, Dude >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Post your opinion here: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fine, I shall: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think there is too much "baseline fallacy" in the economics >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And, I think the idea that the wealthy buy politicians is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a bit trite. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And the reason certain ideas become trite is... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> $ dict trite >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 definitions found >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>    From The Collaborative International Dictionary of >>>>>>>>>>>>> English v.0.48 >>>>>>>>>>>>> [gcide]: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>     Trite \Trite\ (tr[imac]t), a. [L. tritus, p. p. of >>>>>>>>>>>>> terere to >>>>>>>>>>>>>        rub, to wear out; probably akin to E. throw. See >>>>>>>>>>>>> {Throw}, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>        cf. {Contrite}, {Detriment}, {Tribulation}, {Try}.] >>>>>>>>>>>>>        Worn out; common; used until so common as to have lost >>>>>>>>>>>>>        novelty and interest; hackneyed; stale; as, a trite >>>>>>>>>>>>> remark; a >>>>>>>>>>>>>        trite subject. -- {Trite"ly}, adv. -- {Trite"ness}, n. >>>>>>>>>>>>>        [1913 Webster] >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>    From WordNet (r) 3.0 (2006) [wn]: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>     trite >>>>>>>>>>>>>         adj 1: repeated too often; overfamiliar through >>>>>>>>>>>>> overuse; >>>>>>>>>>>>>                "bromidic sermons"; "his remarks were trite >>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>                commonplace"; "hackneyed phrases"; "a stock >>>>>>>>>>>>> answer"; >>>>>>>>>>>>>                "repeating threadbare jokes"; "parroting >>>>>>>>>>>>> some timeworn >>>>>>>>>>>>>                axiom"; "the trite metaphor `hard as >>>>>>>>>>>>> nails'" [syn: >>>>>>>>>>>>>                {banal}, {commonplace}, {hackneyed}, {old- >>>>>>>>>>>>> hat}, >>>>>>>>>>>>>                {shopworn}, {stock(a)}, {threadbare}, >>>>>>>>>>>>> {timeworn}, >>>>>>>>>>>>>                {tired}, {trite}, {well-worn}] >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ...and have I introduced you to the "panopticon" theory of >>>>>>>>>>>>> media >>>>>>>>>>>>> dynamics? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Media doesn't report what everyone thinks, it reports what >>>>>>>>>>>>> it wants >>>>>>>>>>>>> everyone to think everyone thinks. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Political corruption is a problem, but implying that _all_ >>>>>>>>>>>>> wealthy people are part of that is...a baseline fallacy. >>>>>>>>>>>> seriously this group is literally just noah + a bunch of >>>>>>>>>>>> retarded cons >>>>>>>>>>>> with their heads stuck up their butts, eh??? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> it's statistically provable that public opinion does _not_ >>>>>>>>>>>> influence >>>>>>>>>>>> federal policy, and that only the opinion of the wealthy >>>>>>>>>>>> matters in us >>>>>>>>>>>> federal policy. they do this by surveying groups of people, >>>>>>>>>>>> segmenting >>>>>>>>>>>> them by wealth class, and comparing that to the result of public >>>>>>>>>>>> policy. >>>>>>>>>>>> it's not a hard analysis. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> in order to claim the /baserate/ fallacy u need some stats to >>>>>>>>>>>> back that >>>>>>>>>>>> up, claiming it out of the blue is just a _bear_ assertion >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That should be a wrap! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yes. Specifically, fishrap. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> (It's used to attract the _bear_s, I guess?) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> dart200 is confused, that's not what the baseline fallacy >>>>>>>>>> is. The baseline fallacy is assuming "all" for "many", because >>>>>>>>>> the large majority of a group form a "baseline" that is then >>>>>>>>>> used to pigeonhole the whole group. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> nigga are you going to respond with anything useful? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The base line on this board is that the claim you are referring >>>>>>>> to is >>>>>>>> entirely false and fabricated, originating from a mashup of internet >>>>>>>> rumors and memes made up by informants which have all been >>>>>>>> refuted and >>>>>>>> found to be spurious, crude racist and biased - on this very board! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Don't make us go back there, Nick. It won't be easy on your ego. You >>>>>>>> came here to get enlightened. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You came to a bowling alley. Now You're our Bitch. >>>>>>>>   > >>>>>>>>   > >>>>>>>>>    > or just keep proving wealth turns _all_ into retarded >>>>>>>>> children??? >>>>>>>>>    > >>>>>>>>>    > #god >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> cause that's just a true generalization ... not a fallacy >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> and i believe we'll prove it true when build transparent systems >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>    > ??? >>>>>>>>>    > >>>>>>>>>    > #god >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The base rate fallacy (often called a baseline fallacy) is a >>>>>>>> thinking >>>>>>>> error where you ignore general statistical facts (the "base >>>>>>>> rate") and >>>>>>>> focus only on small, specific details or a single story >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> But I'm sure Nick knew all that. That's what I like about him: >>>>>>>>>> his attention to detail. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My biz partner has met with the FCC, along >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with other representatives from regional ISPs that he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> picked up along the way. Can't afford lobbiests? Lobby >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yourself. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Someday I'll have to tell you our "coopetition" story. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note: The opinions expressed by informants are their own >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and do not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> necessarily represent the views of all Usenet board >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subscribers. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would really rather not see the mental midget quoted >>>>>>> if he's going to throw tantrums. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Otherwise, it will be off to the cornfield for you, too. ;) >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> imagine being such a goddamn pussy ur gunna threaten to block >>>>>> others if >>>>>> they don't abide by ur blocklist >>>>> >>>>> Funny think about blocking. The silencing works both ways. Never >>>>> block anybody. There is no way works on a screen can possibly be so >>>>> annoying that you can't bear to read them. And it also doesn't hurt >>>>> you to respond once in a while. >>>>> >>>>>>  > humanity never ceases to reach for new kinds of low >>>>>>  > >>>>>>  > #god >>>> >>>> More tantrums from the troll. >>>> >>>> The worst thing you can do to a troll is ignore them. >> >> if u think i'm being disingenuous when i call u fucking shithead ... >> >> then ur truly a delusional shithead there creon >> >>> >>> Lucky thing I am not trying to think of the worst I can do to >>> somebody. >>> >>>> If you come to my neighborhood and start in on a megaphone, >>>> that is disturbing peace and civility. >>>> >>>> Just as I have no duty to tolerate the intolerable, I have >>>> no duty to be civil to the uncivil. >> >> something about being wealthy and crying about a need for mUh cIvIlItY >> go hand in hand... >> >> prolly trying to gloss over the incredibly uncivil system of global >> exploitation they sit on top of > >Or it's just about you being a dick. Yeh, wilson knows all about dickhood. -- Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain Don't get political with me young man or I'll tie you to a railroad track and <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>> Who dares to talk to El Sombrero? dares: Ned does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away