Re: Exciting New Birth Control Method Called “S ocialism”

On 7/31/2026 10:32 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2026 13:17:16 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 7/31/2026 12:26 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>> On 7/31/26 9:20 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 7/30/2026 12:46 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>> On 7/30/26 7:40 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/29/2026 5:40 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 7/29/26 1:33 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>> "The socialist city may promise to care for every child — but
>>>>>>>> increasingly, it just doesn’t contain any. A new Wall Street
>>>>>>>> Journal analysis finds that, over the past decade, American cities
>>>>>>>> lost children six times faster than the country overall. Some
>>>>>>>> cities that grew still lost kids, replacing families with trust-
>>>>>>>> fund singles, yuppies, and people too poor to leave.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Meanwhile, the five fastest-growing American cities in 2025? Well,
>>>>>>>> they were all exurbs in Texas. To state the obvious revealed
>>>>>>>> preference: middle-class moms and dads do not want to raise their
>>>>>>>> kids amongst dangerous fentanyl addicts while spending 70% of
>>>>>>>> their income on housing, all while sending little Johnny to
>>>>>>>> chaotic public schools (with the fent addicts’ dealers’ kids), so
>>>>>>>> they leave. In that void, the DSA happily agitates for class
>>>>>>>> warfare, because the actual solution (building housing) requires
>>>>>>>> motivated capitalists — whom DSA leaders hate more than their dads."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> socialism now is when local rich people using zoning regulations in
>>>>>>> local govts to block high density housing projects driving up land
>>>>>>> prices in a market, causing families to move where vast tracks of
>>>>>>> land exist outside of locations where rich people block housing
>>>>>>> projects...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Government causes problem.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Collectivists blame it on rich people.
>>>>>
>>>>> yes bro, our govts are largely not run collectively, they are largely
>>>>> run by the wealthy to manage the collective.
>>>>
>>>> Hey, here's an idea. If the government is the problem fix the government.
>>>
>>> yeah and how do we do that when the livelihoods of politicians are
>>> entirely predicated on the wealthy donors who fund them???
>>
>> Not only that, but the people who make up the permanent administrative
>> state want their nest feathered as well.
> >

 >
> Permanent administrative state.  Another one of those monsters under
> wilson's bed.  It must be crowded down there.
 >
No Kings!