Re: oh, it's called a sweeping generalization retard ...

On Sat, 1 Aug 2026 14:40:32 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
wrote:

>On 8/1/2026 2:10 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>> On Sat, 1 Aug 2026 13:40:13 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> On 8/1/2026 1:06 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>
>>>> u literally justify overriding free market principles with closed
>>>> borders because u profit from it!
>>>>
>>>> seriously, capitalists have no principles. it's all up for grabs when
>>>> there is profit to be made!
>>>>
>>>> it's fucking incredible you cried about how capitalism depends on people
>>>> acting ethically ... while here you are in just a thread over shitting
>>>> on basic principles of voluntary association because YOU benefit from
>>>> doing so!
>>>>
>>>> god ur such a delusionally confused basket case wilson and ur wholly
>>>> incapable of realizing it because the level of cognitive dissonance in
>>>> just how much a shithead u've been for long would be too much for ur
>>>> underdeveloped mind to handle,
>>>
>>> My business actually profits more from open borders and no tariffs.
>>>
>>> Open borders means more customers. Over 20% of my customers are immigrants.
>>>
>>> No tariffs means lower prices for my products.
>>>
>>> I support restricted immigration and some tariffs because I think it
>>> benefits the young and low pay workers. And in the end that will benefit
>>> the country at large even if it works against my short-term interests.
>>>
>>> As to free association, that's been illegal in this country for 50 some
>>> years. I'd support bringing it back as it empowers the individual
>>> against the bureaucratic machine state.
>> 
>> That sounds yummy.  But it does not square with what you have been
>> saying here for the last ten years that I have been noticing.
>
>I've never once said that my opposition to mass immigration was because 
>it benefits me. Same with tariffs. That was solely your interpretation.

It does not square with what you have been saying.  It seems to me
that you choose candidates like himbo and ideas like immigration and
tariffs because they seem most likely to lead the us to politically
returning to 1776, which, yes, you have said you want and you like
himbo, not because you think he is a good person, but he is most
likely to lead the us in that direction.

Your ideological commitments as love would say.

>It seems to me like you're hearing what you want to hear because it fits 
>your ideological biases. And because it's easier to deal with people 
>when you categorize them into boxes that have been predefined.
>
>"Boom, into that box you go Wilson. And never shall you be allowed to 
>escape!"

Any time you want wilson.
-- 
Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
Don't get political with me young man
or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
<<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
dares: Ned
does not dare: Julian  shrinks in horror and warns others away