Re: Ceuta is what happens when you’re not serio us abo ut migration
Dude <[email protected]> Sat, 1 Aug 2026 16:10:39 -0700
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/1/2026 1:54 PM, Tara wrote: > On Aug 1, 2026 at 1:17:00 PM EDT, "Julian" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Ursula von der Leyen doesn’t seem to care about the tide of people >> rushing the Spanish border. Voters in Britain will >> >> >> If any of us were in doubt about the scale of the problem facing our >> borders, that ended in half an hour on Thursday. Thousands of topless >> Moroccan men were filmed scrambling over rocks, pushing over walls and >> setting things on fire as they rushed into Ceuta, the Spanish exclave in >> north Africa. >> >> To watch the footage was, simply, to be boggled. How many people were in >> that frame? Why were they doing this? Who even were they? >> >> And what about the people of Ceuta, a city with a population smaller >> than Eastbourne on the coast near Tangier, long governed by Spain? What >> would we do if Eastbourne was overrun by 60,000 foreign berserkers? >> >> Some would argue it already has been. >> >> I’ve written a lot about Nigel Farage, the movement of people and the >> threat of small boats. And, to be honest, I’ve always been a bit >> embarrassed doing it. You don’t have to have watched The Odyssey to know >> that human decency says you must at least try to welcome refugees and >> migrants, especially if you’re one of the richest countries in the world >> and they’re victims of wars you’ve started or meddled in — which is, of >> course, in the end, most of the wars. This has always been Europe’s >> position. >> >> Yet, looking at the surging crowds, I thought: hasn’t it gone a bit far >> now? Europe wants us to do what? >> >> They want us to just deal with thousands more illegals, on top of the >> thousands who have already come here on boats this year — 752 on >> Wednesday alone — because they simply can’t be bothered to stop them or, >> worse, expect us to actually welcome them in, as they do? To give them >> free houses, taxis, mobile phones, allow scores of dependants to also >> come across — because: human rights — when there are barely enough >> houses for the people who are already here, when taxes are this high, >> when the NHS is messy, dysfunctional and killing people? >> >> Are we just expected to take it? >> >> For Ursula von der Leyen, the useless, robo-haired functionary at the >> top of the European Commission, the answer is yes. She couldn’t have >> cared less about the Ceuta stampede. At most, for her, thousands of >> gleeful men romping up metal railings, raiding shops and then sleeping, >> half-naked, out in the open, were a mere HR/health and safety issue. >> >> “Dangerous crossings” must not happen, she tweeted on Friday. “I tasked >> two commissioners to support to control the situation.” >> >> I looked up the commissioners. One was a wet-looking Austrian ninth-tier >> politician, a holder of the Grand Cross of Liechtenstein. The other was >> a former mayor of Dubrovnik and recipient of the 2006 World Mayor Award. >> Are they real people? It’s like sending Gareth and Dawn from The Office. >> >> Europe has never been serious about stopping migration. Philosophically, >> it’s not their thing. Effective returns of people who flood into Greece, >> Spain, Italy, France and so on bump along at only 28 per cent. Spain’s >> prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, whose recent policies made the rush on >> Ceuta possible, could not, when he addressed the press on Friday, even >> bring himself to use the word “border”. The police would put a “physical >> containment barrier” in the sea, he said, to stop migrants swimming the >> three miles from Morocco to Spain. >> >> How about telling them they simply won’t be welcome? How about not >> promising an amnesty, as he did this year, prompting the surge? How >> about seeing a huge body of random people just over the border and not >> automatically thinking, what can I do to make it even easier for these >> people to enter my territory? What can I give them? Shall I pass them a >> lifejacket, a cup of tea, a credit card, an SUV and a four-bedroom house >> in Kilburn? >> >> These people aren’t refugees, by the way, or asylum seekers. They’re >> economic migrants, chancing it. As one of them put it, when the border’s >> down they’ll try anything, because: “Salaries are very low in Morocco. >> It’s dead, Morocco is dead.” >> >> For them, Ceuta’s a jaunty day trip. >> >> Any serious attempt to deal with the many millions who flood in is >> resisted with psychotic anger in the European parliament. Its recent >> plan to create “return hubs” was met with scorn. One commissioner, two >> weeks ago, said that “extraterritorial centres” had bad human rights >> records. Australia’s plans led to “years of arbitrary detention in >> inhuman conditions”. Similar plans by Israel (it’s always Israel) left >> asylum seekers in “legal limbo”. >> >> Fear of legal limbo — is that a reason to desecrate an entire continent? >> These politicians are consumed by madness and guilt. They are >> embarrassed by Europe’s wealth, its global standing and its relative >> ease of life. They feel it is their mission to tear this down by waving >> in thousands of people who shouldn’t be here. And those people know >> this, which is why thousands still tip up in Italy each month, to >> Giorgia Meloni’s horror. Sánchez himself has said that Spain will >> welcome 500,000 migrants. This will tear Europe apart. >> >> Some of these arrivals will head out of Spain and go north, attracted by >> our better healthcare, education system and free houses. >> >> We pay the French £662 million to stop them coming here from Calais, >> but, as Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, found out on Tuesday, >> like every EU official with a lifejacket they don’t do the job. >> >> Philp was mocked for running up and down the French coast, asking the >> gendarmerie why they were doing “absolutely nothing” to stop >> people-smugglers loading up hundreds on boats in front of them. “Our >> order is to let them go like that,” shrugged one. “We just have to say >> to them, don’t do that, it’s dangerous.” >> >> As I said: mere health and safety. >> >> The strange thing about migration is that it should be the easiest thing >> in the world to manage. There is nothing more simple than securing the >> borders of one’s country. Yet many politicians seem unable to speak on >> this matter. Andy Burnham and Ed Miliband, the foreign secretary — all >> tongue-tied. >> >> On other subjects, the prime minister won’t shut up: poetry, tea, pubs, >> education, bus fares, electricity, who he’s going tax, why he felt >> Cambridge let him down. On Europe, he couldn’t be clearer: he wants an >> “even closer” relationship. On immigration, though, nothing. >> >> At some point, perhaps when he sees his TikToks falling off a cliff as >> eyeballs race to the astonishing pictures of Moroccans marching in >> relentless columns across Spanish soil, he may realise that however much >> the EU tries to obfuscate the reality of what is happening, however much >> they try to tidy it away (“50,000 have gone back now”), however much >> they pretend that what happened on Thursday wasn’t their Tiananmen >> Square — an event we can never unsee — there are only two subjects that >> will interest people at the next election. Money, and this. >> >> The longer Burnham prevaricates and utters soundbites, the longer Labour >> tries to pretend the matter is in hand when it isn’t, the more people >> will come across, the more our seaside towns will be destroyed, the more >> stories will leak out about migrants bringing over 18 members of their >> families and/or raping people. Is he ready for it? >> >> >> Camilla Long > > : ( > Where's Noah? The crisis is reverberating far beyond Spain because it challenges one of the European Union’s central promises: that member states can maintain open internal borders while jointly protecting the bloc’s external frontier.